Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Artificial Intelligence in Patch Testing: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and Future Prospects in Dermatology
ABSTRACT
Background:
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) holds the potential to standardize diagnoses, reduce inter-observer variability, and improve overall diagnostic accuracy. However, the challenges faced by the field and the limitations hindering clinical implementation have not been thoroughly explored.
Objective:
This narrative review aims to examine the current applications of AI in patch testing, identify challenges, and propose future directions for their use in dermatology.
Methods:
PubMed was searched in August 2024 to identify studies involving human participants undergoing patch testing with AI or ML interventions. Exclusion criteria were non-English articles and non-original research. Data were synthesized to assess study design, performance, and potential for clinical application.
Results:
Ten out of 94 reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority utilized convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image analysis, with accuracy rates ranging from 90.1% to 99.5%. Other AI models, such as Gradient Boosting and Random Forest, were used for risk prediction and biomarker discovery. Key limitations included limited sample sizes, variability in image capture protocols, and lack of standardized reporting on skin types.
Conclusions:
AI has significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and standardize patch test interpretation with the potential to help expand access to patch testing. However, standardized imaging protocols, larger and more diverse datasets, and improved regulatory frameworks are necessary to realize the full potential of AI in patch testing.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.