Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Oct 8, 2024
Date Accepted: Jun 27, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Effectiveness of a mobile breastfeeding monitoring tool on breastfeeding exclusivity and self-efficacy: a per-protocol analysis of a randomized trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Globally, the pursuit of exclusive breastfeeding remains a formidable challenge. The surge in popularity of mHealth interventions has swiftly emerged as a promising avenue for promoting breastfeeding practices. Nevertheless, research investigating breastfeeding monitoring interventions via mHealth remains scarce.
Objective:
This study aimed to use an application (app) called "Breastfeeding Aiding Tool" to monitor breastfeeding and provide feedback as a remote intervention to improve breastfeeding exclusivity and maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy.
Methods:
This study embarked on a randomized controlled trial, leveraging an innovative app called "Breastfeeding Aiding Tool" as the intervention to monitor breastfeeding practice recorded by users and provide feedback automatedly facilitating remote education and consultation by health workers that enhanced breastfeeding exclusivity and maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy. Lactating mothers and their healthy primiparous infants aged 35-49 days were enrolled from clinics, and the on-line follow-up period was 2 months. Breastfeeding practices, maternal breastfeeding confidence assessed by the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form and maternal depression status assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Survey Depression Scale were collected based on self-report through SoJump.
Results:
109 mother-infant dyads (55 in the intervention group and 54 in the control group) completed the 2-month follow-ups and 28 mothers actively engaged with the app tool. In the per-protocol analysis sample, the rate of exclusive breastfeeding of the using-tool group stood at 57.1%, compared to 48.2% in the comparison (Odds Ratio (OR)=1.44 (95% CI: 0.60,3.41); adjusted OR(aOR)=1.68 (95% CI: 0.60,4.70); p>0.05); the rate of full breastfeeding (comprising predominant and exclusive breastfeeding) was significantly higher in the mothers using the app tool than in the non-users (92.9% vs. 72.8%; OR=4.85 (95%CI: 1.06,22.15); aOR=6.96 (95%CI: 1.28,37.90); p<0.05). Furthermore, maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy in the app-use group improved by 1.36 (95%CI: -3.79,1.50), while it declined slightly by 0.16 (95%CI: -3.16,2.84) (p>0.05) in the non-users. The depression scores among the mothers using the app decreased by 2.29 (95%CI: -5.19,0.62), whereas those in the non-using group increased by 1.07(95%CI: -0.58,2.73) (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
Our findings underscore the significant potential of the "Breastfeeding Aiding Tool" app as an aiding tool for breastfeeding guiding in sustaining breastfeeding practices, reducing formula usage, and enhancing maternal breastfeeding emotions. To further validate the effectiveness of improving breastfeeding exclusivity and self-efficacy, studies should endeavor to enroll a larger cohort of mothers utilizing the app. Clinical Trial: The intervention study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065220).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.