Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 27, 2024
Date Accepted: May 16, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review

Wang C, Chang L, Chen J, Kong J, Qi H

eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66965

DOI: 10.2196/66965

PMID: 40835422

PMCID: 12367351

eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: A Scoping Review

  • Chen Wang; 
  • Luoyuan Chang; 
  • Jindou Chen; 
  • Jingqi Kong; 
  • Huiying Qi

ABSTRACT

Background:

eHealth literacy is a necessary competency for individuals to achieve health self-management in the digital age, and the evaluation of eHealth literacy is an important foundation for clarifying individual eHealth literacy levels and implementing eHealth behavior interventions.

Objective:

This study reviews the research progress of eHealth literacy assessment instruments to offer suggestions for further development and improvement, as well as to provide reference to eHealth intervention.

Methods:

Using the method of systematic review, with Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and EBSCO literature databases as data sources, 13 articles were screened according to PRISMA guidelines. Analysis in terms of the development process, instruments characteristics and assessment themes were conducted to reveal the content, features and application of currently available eHealth literacy assessment instruments.

Results:

The analysis of the 13 studies indicated that the development of instruments is improving constantly as the concept of eHealth literacy evolves. The reliability coefficient of 13 eHealth literacy assessment instruments all reflected satisfactory reliability, while the selection of the type of validity tests varied according to different assessment focuses.

Conclusions:

Subjective assessment instruments account for the most, among which eHEALS is the most widely used, while comprehensive assessment instruments incorporate objective assessment criteria. In aspect of assessment themes, skill factors are involved in many instruments, but psychology factors and information factors are less concerned.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang C, Chang L, Chen J, Kong J, Qi H

eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66965

DOI: 10.2196/66965

PMID: 40835422

PMCID: 12367351

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.