Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Sep 27, 2024
Date Accepted: May 16, 2025
eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: A Scoping Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
eHealth literacy is a necessary competency for individuals to achieve health self-management in the digital age, and the evaluation of eHealth literacy is an important foundation for clarifying individual eHealth literacy levels and implementing eHealth behavior interventions.
Objective:
This study reviews the research progress of eHealth literacy assessment instruments to offer suggestions for further development and improvement, as well as to provide reference to eHealth intervention.
Methods:
Using the method of systematic review, with Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and EBSCO literature databases as data sources, 13 articles were screened according to PRISMA guidelines. Analysis in terms of the development process, instruments characteristics and assessment themes were conducted to reveal the content, features and application of currently available eHealth literacy assessment instruments.
Results:
The analysis of the 13 studies indicated that the development of instruments is improving constantly as the concept of eHealth literacy evolves. The reliability coefficient of 13 eHealth literacy assessment instruments all reflected satisfactory reliability, while the selection of the type of validity tests varied according to different assessment focuses.
Conclusions:
Subjective assessment instruments account for the most, among which eHEALS is the most widely used, while comprehensive assessment instruments incorporate objective assessment criteria. In aspect of assessment themes, skill factors are involved in many instruments, but psychology factors and information factors are less concerned.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.