Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Sep 25, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 2, 2024 - Nov 27, 2024
Date Accepted: Apr 15, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Protocol for an International, Multilingual, Online, Comparative Sexuality Study Amongst Heterosexual-identified Men Who Have Sex with Men and Men of Diverse Sexual Identities
ABSTRACT
Background:
Sexuality is multidimensional and complex, comprised of identity development, attraction, and behaviour. Heterosexual-identified men who have sex with men (H-MSM) experience sexual identity and behaviour discordance yet it is unknown how H-MSM compare to concordant heterosexual men as well as gay, bisexual, and queer (GBQ+) men regarding sexuality constructs.
Objective:
To survey adult cisgender men in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom to gain greater insight into how different demographics, identity development, attractions, behaviours, technology use, relationship negotiation and communication skills, and PrEP and life satisfaction relate to each other, and then to interview H-MSM for in-depth follow-up on survey concepts.
Methods:
Purposive sampling will be utilized to recruit men via online and offline venues. Data collection will be multifaceted and include an online questionnaire for adult cisgender men and subsequent interview for H-MSM. The survey will be available in English, French, and Spanish. Structural equation modeling, underpinned by hegemonic masculinity and sexual scripts theory, will be performed to test the relationships between the survey’s variables. Interpretive phenomenology will be employed on the qualitative data to consider how unique sociocultural factors influence H-MSM’s sexuality and experiences, allowing for similarities and differences across participants to be identified and explored.
Results:
This research will broaden the scope of existing literature and contribute to advancements in interventions and knowledge to support the overall health and well-being of H-MSM. An examination of potential differences between H-MSM, concordant heterosexual men, and GBQ+ men will also strengthen understanding of H-MSM and reaffirm the need to include them in further research and practice without dismissing them as closeted GBQ+ men.
Conclusions:
This study aims to provide key insights into avenues for research and practice with men whose sexuality and sexual behaviours may be outside of commonly accepted norms.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.