Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Aug 18, 2025)
Date Submitted: Sep 19, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The readability of online health infographics: a comparison between CDC and WHO
ABSTRACT
Background:
Effective communication of health information involves clear messaging to ensure that readers comprehend and can easily apply behavioral recommendations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the readability and understandability of online health infographics from the CDC and WHO to determine whether these infographics are written to the recommended reading levels.
Objective:
Online health infographics from graphic page on the CDC website (51 infographics) and WHO website (75 infographics) were included in the research. We conducted 6 readability tests which 3 tests focused on textual features and 3 tests focused on cognitive factors to ensure a comprehensive representation.
Methods:
We used the traditional readability formulas like Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and The SMOG Index which focused on textual features and formulas considered cognitive factors like ATOS, New Dale-Chall and Coh-Metrix to test the infographics readability. We compared the readability of online health infographics with general guidelines and the differences between the CDC and WHO.
Results:
We found that most online health infographics from the CDC and WHO exceed the general guideline. Specifically, online health infographics in WHO have better performance on readability formulars that focus on textural features and cognitive factors compared with CDC.
Conclusions:
Both the CDC and WHO which provide health information to the public should be mindful of the textural features and cognitive factors of the online health infographics to improve the readability. Clinical Trial: No clinical trials.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.