Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 11, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 10, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

How Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Medications Are Depicted in Instagram Posts Regarding Women’s Health, Nontraditional Access, and Barriers to Access: Content Analysis

Bloom B, Bragg MA, Jay MR, Harel D, Cline C, Crowe M, Montoya A, Muthuramalingam S, Santana R, Albert SL

How Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Medications Are Depicted in Instagram Posts Regarding Women’s Health, Nontraditional Access, and Barriers to Access: Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66400

DOI: 10.2196/66400

PMID: 40905615

PMCID: 12447010

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

GLP-1 Medications in the Social Media Spotlight: Content Analysis of Women's Health, Nontraditional Access, and Barriers to Access

  • Brittnie Bloom; 
  • Marie A. Bragg; 
  • Melanie R. Jay; 
  • Daphna Harel; 
  • Camile Cline; 
  • Matthew Crowe; 
  • Avery Montoya; 
  • Sandhya Muthuramalingam; 
  • Roberto Santana; 
  • Stephanie L. Albert

ABSTRACT

Background:

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) medications, recently introduced in the US for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity, have sparked interest and discussion on social media. Social media has emerged as a prominent platform for the distribution of health information; its vast user base and accessibility making it a popular resource for individuals seeking medical advice.

Objective:

This study characterized GLP-1-related content on Instagram about three critical areas of public health – women’s health, access from nontraditional settings, and barriers to access.

Methods:

We examined 40 GLP-1 related Instagram posts to develop a list of the most frequently used hashtags. Ten “top posts” were collected for 7 days (July 11-17 2023) for 11 study hashtags (e.g., #Ozempic; n=770). Duplicates, deleted posts/accounts, non-English content, and unrelated posts were removed. Each post was reviewed by at least two coders. Coding discrepancies were resolved through discussion.

Results:

The final sample included 239 posts. More than half of posts (n=130) were from GLP-1 medication users. Raters perceived most users to be female (92.8%); inferred that most used medications for weight-loss (53.1%); determined the most frequently noted health condition was PCOS (19.2); judged posts to have positive sentiments about well-being (49.2%) and towards the medications (76.9%). About a quarter of posts (23.0%) offered services for obtaining GLP-1 medications; GLP-1 medications were perceived to be accessible via non-traditional healthcare settings (e.g., medical spas) versus traditional (16.3% vs. 5.0%). Most users (80.4%) were perceived to be white; barriers to access (i.e., shortages, insurance, cost) were infrequently mentioned (2.5%, 1.3%, 0.4%, respectively).

Conclusions:

Findings highlight the perceived benefits of GLP-1 medications on women’s health, the need to increase health literacy about where to safely access medications, and how additional attention is needed for equitable access to GLP-1 medications. The onus is on social media companies to promote content that is safe and for the healthcare system and its payors to address healthcare inequities for historically marginalized communities.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bloom B, Bragg MA, Jay MR, Harel D, Cline C, Crowe M, Montoya A, Muthuramalingam S, Santana R, Albert SL

How Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Medications Are Depicted in Instagram Posts Regarding Women’s Health, Nontraditional Access, and Barriers to Access: Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66400

DOI: 10.2196/66400

PMID: 40905615

PMCID: 12447010

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.