Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Sep 7, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 28, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Peng Y, Zhang Z, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Wang R, Zhang J, Zhai S, Jin Q, Zhou J, Chen J

Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e66248

DOI: 10.2196/66248

PMID: 40116739

PMCID: 11951820

Multidimensional Evaluation in the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Study

  • Yingchun Peng; 
  • Zhiying Zhang; 
  • Ruyi Zhang; 
  • Yiyao Zhang; 
  • Runying Wang; 
  • Jiaying Zhang; 
  • Shaoqi Zhai; 
  • Qilin Jin; 
  • Jiaojiao Zhou; 
  • Jingjing Chen

ABSTRACT

Background:

To address the challenges of population ageing, WHO has made a great effort to promote Age-Friendly Communities Initiatives(AFCIs). Previous researches evaluating Age-Friendly Communities(AFCs) are often associated with negative health outcomes of the elderly.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate different living experience of the elderly in the communities which have adopted age-friendly policies, such as the sense of gain, happiness and security, summarize the deficiencies in the process of constructing AFCs in China, and provide some implications to promote AFCIs in the world.

Methods:

By using a multistage sampling strategy, 470 community residents between rural and urban areas participated in this study. A self-designed questionnaire was designed to use a standardized method to evaluate the elderlys’ living experience and their community’s age-friendliness.

Results:

In this research, many community residents(81.3%) were not aware of the relevant concepts of AFCs, most participants highlighted the importance of community support and health services. The results also shown that the degree of the sense of security among five dimensions was the highest, while the degree of social support was the lowest, especially the urban elderlys’ evaluation. Meanwhile, there were significant difference in the evaluation of living experiences from different aged residents in urban areas about three dimensions, including the degree of age-friendly(P<0.001), the degree of social support(P<0.001), and the sense of gain in community life(P=0.013).

Conclusions:

China is in the early stages of becoming age-friendly. We further highlight the importance of continued research on multiply support from from the family, communities, and the government to promote AFCIs. These outcomes have a direct and positive impact on the well‐being of older adults.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Peng Y, Zhang Z, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Wang R, Zhang J, Zhai S, Jin Q, Zhou J, Chen J

Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e66248

DOI: 10.2196/66248

PMID: 40116739

PMCID: 11951820

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.