Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Mar 30, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mobile Apps for Tinnitus: Systematic Search in App Stores and Review of Intervention Components and Behavior Change Techniques

Rinn A, Goetsch S, Hannibal S, Lehr D, Weise C

Mobile Apps for Tinnitus: Systematic Search in App Stores and Review of Intervention Components and Behavior Change Techniques

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e66151

DOI: 10.2196/66151

PMID: 42155139

PMCID: 13186522

What Do Mobile Apps for Tinnitus Offer? A Systematic App Store Search and Review on Intervention Components and Behavior Change Techniques Used in Tinnitus Apps

  • Alina Rinn; 
  • Sarah Goetsch; 
  • Sandy Hannibal; 
  • Dirk Lehr; 
  • Cornelia Weise

ABSTRACT

Background:

Previous research suggests that 14.4 % of the general population are affected by tinnitus. For some of those affected, the ear noise is bothersome or associated with severe distress. Previous studies identified several apps aiming to support users suffering from tinnitus. Yet, knowledge on the content of tinnitus apps is limited.

Objective:

This study aimed at analyzing tinnitus app content by assessing intervention components and Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs) used.

Methods:

A systematic search using 7 search terms (e.g. tinnitus, ear noise) was performed on the Google Play Store as well as the Apple App Store. Apps designed specifically for tinnitus and offered in German or English met the inclusion criteria. Two independent raters categorized intervention components and BCTs.

Results:

1.198 apps were identified in the systematic search. Of those, 69 apps were included in the final analysis. 58 out of 69 apps offered sounds (e.g. white noise, nature sounds). Furthermore, numerous apps assessed tinnitus characteristics (n = 38) and provided the user with information on tinnitus (n = 27). The BCTs primarily used were “instruction on how to perform the behavior” (n = 25), “feedback on behaviour” (n = 11), “behavioral practice/ rehearsal” (n = 11), “information about health consequences” (n = 11) “information about emotional consequences” (n = 11), and “prompts/cues” (n = 11).

Conclusions:

Most of the tinnitus apps offered sounds (e.g. white noise, nature sounds) Notably, other Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) elements (e.g. cognitive restructuring attention training or relaxation training) were implemented less frequently although CBT is recommended in tinnitus treatment guidelines. Future research on the efficacy of tinnitus apps is needed. With a large number of apps being offered on a low threshold, this study aims at providing an overview for research and health care professionals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rinn A, Goetsch S, Hannibal S, Lehr D, Weise C

Mobile Apps for Tinnitus: Systematic Search in App Stores and Review of Intervention Components and Behavior Change Techniques

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e66151

DOI: 10.2196/66151

PMID: 42155139

PMCID: 13186522

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.