Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 2, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 20, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Family Caregiver Perspectives on Digital Methods to Measure Stress: Qualitative Descriptive Study

Rose L, Saha S, Flowers E, Ang CS, Casson AJ, Condell J, Matcham F, Robinson T, Rooksby J

Family Caregiver Perspectives on Digital Methods to Measure Stress: Qualitative Descriptive Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66034

DOI: 10.2196/66034

PMID: 40273447

PMCID: 12062762

Family caregiver perspectives on digital methods to measure of stress: a qualitative descriptive study

  • Louise Rose; 
  • Sian Saha; 
  • Emily Flowers; 
  • Chi Siang Ang; 
  • Alex J Casson; 
  • Joan Condell; 
  • Faith Matcham; 
  • Tony Robinson; 
  • John Rooksby

ABSTRACT

Background:

Family caregivers provide essential care in the home to millions of individuals around the globe annually. However, family caregiving results in considerable burden, financial hardship, stress and psychological morbidity. Identifying and managing stress in caregivers is important as they have a dual role in manging their own health as well as that of the person they care for. If stress becomes overwhelming, a caregiver may no longer be able to perform this essential role. Digital methods of stress monitoring may be one strategy of identifying effective interventions to relieve caregiver burden and stress.

Objective:

To explore perceived acceptability, challenges, and opportunities of using digital and biosensing technologies to measure caregiver stress.

Methods:

We conducted a descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and framework analysis methods. We recruited adult family caregivers (18 years) currently or previously caring for an adult in the home with significant health issues. Interview questions focused on stress monitoring more generally and on ecological momentary assessment, remote monitoring technologies such as smartwatches, and fluid biosensors. Data were analysed using the framework approach.

Results:

We recruited 27 family caregivers of whom 70% were currently in a caregiving role, the remainder were previously in a caregiving role. We identified three themes with ten subthemes. Themes comprised ‘Providing meaningful data’ with subthemes of ‘Monitoring without action is pointless’; ‘Monitoring that enables self-management’ and ‘Seeing the bigger picture’; ‘Low burden monitoring’ with subthemes of ‘Low effort’, ‘Practical alongside daily routines’ and ‘Retaining control over monitoring’; and ‘Inadvertent harms of stress monitoring’ with subthemes of ‘Stigma of stress’, ‘Need for discretion’, ‘Contributing to stress’, and ‘Trust’.

Conclusions:

In this descriptive qualitative study examining the perspectives of a diverse sample of family caregivers on methods of stress monitoring we identified three themes. These provide useful considerations for use of stress monitoring and implementation of interventions to ameliorate family caregiver stress of relevance to social care and community teams, researchers, and policy makers. These include providing meaningful situationally specific data resulting in action, that does not contribute to caregiver burden, or in inadvertent harm to either the caregiver or the care recipient. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rose L, Saha S, Flowers E, Ang CS, Casson AJ, Condell J, Matcham F, Robinson T, Rooksby J

Family Caregiver Perspectives on Digital Methods to Measure Stress: Qualitative Descriptive Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66034

DOI: 10.2196/66034

PMID: 40273447

PMCID: 12062762

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.