Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Date Submitted: Aug 20, 2024
Date Accepted: May 5, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Developing requirements for a standardized system to return individual research results back to study participants: a narrative review
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop a list of core system requirements for returning individual research results to study participants. METHODS: We conducted a narrative literature review of existing platforms used to return research results to study participants. The search strategy included English-language articles published between May/2013 and May/2023. Concepts related to returning, disseminating, and sharing research results were searched for in 1) published research reports on Web of Science and MEDLINE, 2) grey literature, and 3) the bibliographies of included articles. Screening and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence. Results and requirements were synthesized thematically. RESULTS: Overall, 6,608 abstracts were screened, and 266 articles underwent full-text review to identify eight articles describing the development and evaluation of seven different return of results systems. Seven of the eight articles reported the use of multi-modal dissemination methods, including a combination of physical documents, emails, phone calls, and digital platforms to support text and graphical data representations. One article outlined accessibility features to serve the specific participant population. None of the articles described in detail how results were or were not anonymized. Four studies relied on an expert or clinician to share results on behalf of the research team. Additional educational or contextual materials were included alongside results in four studies, including specific materials designed for follow-up with experts and clinicians. Participants were not hesitant to receive negative results and instead aimed to incorporate such information into their lives via lifestyle changes, clinical intervention, or seeking community. CONCLUSIONS: Return of results systems should support multiple modes of dissemination for text-based results. Additional educational and lay-language materials are helpful for participants to understand and use information gained from receiving results.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.