Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 19, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 19, 2024 - Oct 14, 2024
Date Accepted: Mar 25, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: Systematic Scoping Review

Wong DWC, Wang J, Cheung SMY, Lai DKH, Chiu ATS, Pu D, Cheung JCW, Kwok TCY

Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: Systematic Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65551

DOI: 10.2196/65551

PMID: 40324167

PMCID: 12089864

Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: A Systematic Scoping Review

  • Duo Wai-Chi Wong; 
  • Jiao Wang; 
  • Sophia Ming-Yan Cheung; 
  • Derek Ka-Hei Lai; 
  • Armstrong Tat-San Chiu; 
  • Dai Pu; 
  • James Chung-Wai Cheung; 
  • Timothy Chi-Yui Kwok

ABSTRACT

Background:

Dysphagia affects more than half of older adults with dementia and is associated with a 10-fold increase in mortality. The development of accessible, objective, and reliable screening tools is crucial for early detection and management.

Objective:

This systematic scoping review aims to examine the current state-of-the-art in artificial intelligence (AI) and sensor-based technologies for dysphagia screening.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic literature search across CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, performed by two independent researchers. The findings were reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) framework. The methodological quality of the eligible articles was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, to which we added a “model” domain for a more comprehensive evaluation. Data extracted from the included studies were synthesized narratively.

Results:

The review included 24 studies involving 2,979 participants. Most studies focused on per-individual classification rather than per-swallow event classification. Acoustic (n = 13) and vibratory signals (n = 9) are the primary modality sources utilized in dysphagia screening. Additional sources included nasal airflow, electromyography (EMG), strain and motion analysis, and optical methods. Notably, six studies employed multimodal approaches, while the remaining 18 studies focused on a single modality. Machine learning models, particularly support vector machines (n = 13), were frequently utilized, while deep learning approaches have been gaining traction. Performance metrics varied widely across studies, with some reporting high accuracy and AUC values, despite small testing samples. Multimodal systems appeared to perform better than unimodal systems. The methodological quality assessment revealed a high risk of bias in many studies, particularly in patient sampling, blinding procedures, and model development. The lack of external validation and domain adaptation testing raises concerns about the transferability and real-world applicability of these AI-based systems.

Conclusions:

This review provides an overview of technological advancements in the use of artificial intelligence and sensors for dysphagia screening. These promising developments in screening tools pave the way for continuous long-term tele-swallowing assessments.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wong DWC, Wang J, Cheung SMY, Lai DKH, Chiu ATS, Pu D, Cheung JCW, Kwok TCY

Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: Systematic Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65551

DOI: 10.2196/65551

PMID: 40324167

PMCID: 12089864

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.