Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 6, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 7, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Optimizing Virtual Follow-Up Care: Realist Evaluation of Experiences and Perspectives of Patients With Breast and Prostate Cancer

Scruton S, Bender JL, Wong G, Babinksi S, Squires LR, Berlin A, Easley J, McGee S, Noel K, Rodin D, Sussman J, Urquhart R

Optimizing Virtual Follow-Up Care: Realist Evaluation of Experiences and Perspectives of Patients With Breast and Prostate Cancer

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65148

DOI: 10.2196/65148

PMID: 39752659

PMCID: 11748426

Optimizing virtual follow-up care: A realist evaluation of breast and prostate cancer experiences and perspectives

  • Sarah Scruton; 
  • Jacqueline L. Bender; 
  • Geoff Wong; 
  • Stephanie Babinksi; 
  • Lauren R. Squires; 
  • Alejandro Berlin; 
  • Julie Easley; 
  • Sharon McGee; 
  • Ken Noel; 
  • Danielle Rodin; 
  • Jonathan Sussman; 
  • Robin Urquhart

ABSTRACT

Background:

Virtual follow-up (VFU) has the potential to enhance cancer survivorship care. However, a greater understanding is needed of how VFU can be optimized.

Objective:

This study examined how, for whom, and in what contexts VFU works for cancer survivorship care.

Methods:

We conducted a realist evaluation of VFU among breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC) patients at an urban cancer centre during the COVID-19 pandemic. Realist evaluations examine how underlying causal processes of an intervention (mechanisms) in specific circumstances (contexts) interact to produce results (outcomes). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of patients ≤5 years post-diagnosis. Interviews were audio-recorded and analyzed using a realist logic of analysis.

Results:

Participants (n = 24; 12 BC, 12 PC) were on average 59.6 years-of-age (SD = 10.7). The majority (83.3%) were satisfied with VFU and wanted VFU options to continue after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, VFU impacted patient perceptions of the quality of their care, particularly in terms of its effectiveness and patient-centeredness. Whether VFU worked well for patients depended on patient factors (e.g., needs, psychosocial well-being, technological competence), provider factors (e.g., socioemotional behaviours, technological competence), and virtual care system factors (e.g., modality, functionality, usability, virtual process of care and communication workflows). Key mechanisms that interacted with contexts to produce positive outcomes (e.g., satisfaction) were visual cues, effective and empathetic communication, and a trusting relationship with their provider.

Conclusions:

Patients value VFU; however, VFU is not working as well as it could for patients. To optimize VFU, it is critical to consider contexts and mechanisms that impact patient perceptions of the patient-centeredness and effectiveness of their care. Offering patients the choice of in-person, telephone or video visits when possible, coupled with streamlined access to in-person care when required, is important. Prioritizing and addressing patient needs, enhancing physician online socioemotional behaviours and technology competency, and enhancing VFU functionality, usability, processes of care and communication workflows will improve patient perceptions of the patient-centeredness and effectiveness of virtual care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Scruton S, Bender JL, Wong G, Babinksi S, Squires LR, Berlin A, Easley J, McGee S, Noel K, Rodin D, Sussman J, Urquhart R

Optimizing Virtual Follow-Up Care: Realist Evaluation of Experiences and Perspectives of Patients With Breast and Prostate Cancer

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65148

DOI: 10.2196/65148

PMID: 39752659

PMCID: 11748426

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.