Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since May 12, 2025)

Date Submitted: Aug 4, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 9, 2024 - Oct 4, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as Sources of Information on Acute Pancreatitis: Assessment and Analysis of Content and Quality

  • Mengqi Ying; 
  • Yuping Lai; 
  • Menghui Wang; 
  • Chengbo He; 
  • Yin Li; 
  • Wenjie Fu; 
  • Huan Wang; 
  • Yaobin Ouyang; 
  • Chuan Xie

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background Acute pancreatitis is a primarily sterile inflammation caused by premature intracellular protease activation, which has caught the attention of social media platforms such as Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube. However, the content and quality of medical information on social media exists unclear and indeterminate.

Objective:

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the content and quality of online videos about acute pancreatitis from Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube

Methods:

Methods A video search using acute pancreatic-related keywords was conducted on three video-sharing platforms: Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube. We recorded basic information presented in the videos and identified the source and content type of each video. The educational content and quality of each video were evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and Modified DISCERN. A comparative analysis was conducted on the videos obtained from these three sources.

Results:

Results 300 videos were considered for assessment. Most videos were provided by health professionals (50.7%, 152/300), followed by nonprofit organizations (27.7%, 83/300). Additionally, 13.2% of videos (36/300) were offered by science communicators, and 5.7% (17/300) were provided by general users. The remaining videos were uploaded by news agencies (3.3%, 10/300) and two for-profit organizations (0.7%, 2/300). The content types of the 300 videos were classified into five categories: clinical diagnosis (25%, 75/300), prognosis (5%, 15/300), etiologies and causations (6.7%, 20/300), scientific introductions (51%, 153/300), and treatment methods (12.3%, 37/300). The overall quality of the videos, as evaluated by GQS, JAMA, and Modified DISCERN, was found to be moderate, with scores of 2.67/5, 2.22/4, and 2.63/5 points, respectively.

Conclusions:

Conclusions Video-sharing platforms have become easily accessible sources for patients seeking information about their diseases. This innovative study demonstrates that social media videos can facilitate public learning about clinical diagnosis, prognosis, treatment methods, etiologies and causations, and scientific introductions of acute pancreatitis. However, both the content and quality of uploaded videos are currently inadequate. In the future, greater efforts should be made to enhance the content and quality of videos on acute pancreatitis and increase public awareness.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ying M, Lai Y, Wang M, He C, Li Y, Fu W, Wang H, Ouyang Y, Xie C

Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as Sources of Information on Acute Pancreatitis: Assessment and Analysis of Content and Quality

JMIR Preprints. 04/08/2024:65070

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.65070

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/65070

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.