Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Education (no longer under consideration since Dec 18, 2024)

Date Submitted: Aug 4, 2024

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Comparing the Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard in the Korean Medical Licensing Examination: A Gastroenterology Perspective

  • Seong Ji Choi; 
  • Jeongkuk Seo; 
  • Sung Wook Hwang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning are revolutionizing the field of medicine, including gastroenterology. Notable among these advancements are large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Bard. While their effectiveness in the United States Medical Licensing Examination has been evaluated, their performance in non-English tests, such as the Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE), remains underexplored.

Objective:

This study examined the performance of LLMs in the KMLE and assessed the explanation quality for gastroenterology questions.

Methods:

We analyzed the performance of three LLMs, ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), GPT-4, and Bard in the official KMLE questions from 2021 and 2022 by focusing on their accuracy and consistency. The questions were categorized based on their subject and the inclusion of images. The quality of explanations provided by the LLMs for gastroenterology questions was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS).

Results:

In KMLE 2021 and 2022, GPT-4 achieved accuracy rates of 72.1% and 62.5%, respectively, with consistency of approximately 60%. These rates were significantly higher than those of ChatGPT and Bard. The higher accuracy was maintained across most subjects, as well as in questions with images. For gastroenterology questions, GPT-4 achieved accuracy rates of 55.8% and 63.9% in KMLE 2021 and 2022, respectively. The GQS of GPT-4 was significantly higher than those of other models, even in cases of incorrect responses.

Conclusions:

Unlike ChatGPT and Bard, GPT-4 achieved passing grades for the KMLE 2021 and 2022, and demonstrated high-quality explanations in gastroenterology. Further research on multimodal models and the use of prompt engineering is warranted.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Choi SJ, Seo J, Hwang SW

Comparing the Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard in the Korean Medical Licensing Examination: A Gastroenterology Perspective

JMIR Preprints. 04/08/2024:65063

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.65063

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/65063

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.