Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Aug 2, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 26, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Characterizing Emergency Department Disposition Conversations for Persons Living With Dementia: Protocol for an Ethnographic Study

Seidenfeld J, Tucker M, Harris-Gersten M, Fix GM, Guzman I, Sperber NR, Hastings SN

Characterizing Emergency Department Disposition Conversations for Persons Living With Dementia: Protocol for an Ethnographic Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e65043

DOI: 10.2196/65043

PMID: 39642361

PMCID: 11662188

Characterizing Emergency Department Disposition Conversations for Persons Living with Dementia: Protocol for an Ethnographic Study

  • Justine Seidenfeld; 
  • Matthew Tucker; 
  • Melissa Harris-Gersten; 
  • Gemmae M Fix; 
  • Ivonne Guzman; 
  • Nina R Sperber; 
  • Susan N. Hastings

ABSTRACT

Background:

Almost 40% of persons living with dementia (PLWDs) make an emergency department (ED) visit each year. One of the most impactful and costly elements of their ED care is the decision to discharge or admit them to the hospital- the “disposition” decision. When more than one reasonable option exists regarding a health care decision, such as the decision to admit or not, it often requires a complex conversation between patients, care ED partners, and ED providers, ideally involving shared decision-making (SDM). However, little is known about how these conversations are conducted, and the real-world context in which they take place. Best practices in ED communication and SDM for PLWDs and their care partners are limited.

Objective:

To characterize current practices in ED disposition conversations for PLWDs and their care partners, informed by perspectives from patient and care partner participants.

Methods:

This study will use an ethnographic design, including direct observation methods with a semi-structured data collection tool to capture the ED encounter for up to 20 patient and care partner dyads, including all discussions about dispositions. Follow up qualitative, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with PLWDs and their care partners to explore specific observations made during their ED encounter, and to gain insight into their perspective on their role and elements of decision support used during that conversation.

Results:

Data collection was initiated in October 2023, with 13 dyads recruited and observed as of July 2024. Further data collection is ongoing, and initial codebook refinement has started.

Conclusions:

Novel methods can offer novel insights. By combining direct observation and follow-up interviews about an ED visit, our study design will provide insights into how ED disposition occurs in real world settings for PLWDs. Findings can inform more patient-centered interventions for disposition decision making.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Seidenfeld J, Tucker M, Harris-Gersten M, Fix GM, Guzman I, Sperber NR, Hastings SN

Characterizing Emergency Department Disposition Conversations for Persons Living With Dementia: Protocol for an Ethnographic Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e65043

DOI: 10.2196/65043

PMID: 39642361

PMCID: 11662188

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.