Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Aug 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 27, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Everyday Patient-Centered Discussion Model for Primary Care: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Study of the Zeroing in on Individualized, Patient-Centered Decisions (ZIP) Approach

Dorin SS, Schulenberg FB, Visnic S, Youles B, Holleman R, Sussman JB, Caverly TJ

An Everyday Patient-Centered Discussion Model for Primary Care: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Study of the Zeroing in on Individualized, Patient-Centered Decisions (ZIP) Approach

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e64998

DOI: 10.2196/64998

PMID: 41060690

PMCID: 12547340

An Everyday Patient-Centered Discussion Model for Primary Care: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Study of the Zeroing in on Individualized, Patient-Centered Decisions (ZIP) Approach

  • Sarah Skurla Dorin; 
  • Frances B Schulenberg; 
  • Stephanie Visnic; 
  • Bradley Youles; 
  • Rob Holleman; 
  • Jeremy B. Sussman; 
  • Tanner J. Caverly

ABSTRACT

Background:

The ‘Everyday Shared Decision Making’ approach (ESDM) was developed as a more feasible approach to personalizing decisions in primary care. This approach includes 3 key elements: 1) making a tailored recommendation, 2) qualitatively presenting tradeoffs, and 3) supporting patient decisional autonomy. Previous work found this approach to be acceptable. However, little is known about how the Everyday SDM approach can be integrated within the primary care setting.

Objective:

To describe the protocol for a pilot test of the feasibility and acceptability, to both patients and primary care clinicians (PCCs), of using a paper-based deployment of the Everyday SDM approach in the primary care clinic.

Methods:

Two case studies were examined: lung cancer screening (LCS) and blood pressure (BP) treatment decisions. This study was a multi-component pilot implementation study involving training PCCs in the Everyday SDM approach and providing them with an encounter-based Decision Aid supporting the Everyday SDM approach during clinic visits. Eligible patients were either candidates for an initial lung cancer screening conversation or a conversation about intensifying blood pressure medication. The patient-PCC medical encounters were audio-recorded. Following the appointment, the patient completed a short survey and semi-structured interview. After PCCs completed 2-3 study appointments, they completed a semi-structured interview reflecting on their experience with the Everyday SDM approach.

Results:

We recruited 10 PCCs and 23 patients (4 LCS patients and 19 BP patients). Data analysis is currently ongoing.

Conclusions:

The results from this pilot study will contribute to the ongoing efforts towards integrating a practical approach to SDM into primary care. This pilot will lay the groundwork for an effective and efficient larger-scale trial.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dorin SS, Schulenberg FB, Visnic S, Youles B, Holleman R, Sussman JB, Caverly TJ

An Everyday Patient-Centered Discussion Model for Primary Care: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Study of the Zeroing in on Individualized, Patient-Centered Decisions (ZIP) Approach

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e64998

DOI: 10.2196/64998

PMID: 41060690

PMCID: 12547340

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.