Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Jul 26, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 30, 2024 - Sep 24, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 19, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project

McElroy JA, Smith JB, Everett KD

Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e64809

DOI: 10.2196/64809

PMID: 40106833

PMCID: 11941909

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests among Federally Qualified Health Centers Patients in Missouri, USA: Quality Improvement Project

  • Jane A McElroy; 
  • Jamie B Smith; 
  • Kevin D Everett

ABSTRACT

Background:

Compelling evidence shows screening detects colorectal cancer (CRC) at earlier stages and prevents the development of CRC through removal of pre-cancerous polyps. For average risk patients, there are three commonly used screening tests used in the United States—two types of stool tests collected at home (FIT/FOBT and FIT-DNA) and colonoscopy completed at procedural centers.

Objective:

This study’s purpose is to examine variation by month for the three types of CRC testing to evaluate consistent patient care by clinical staff.

Methods:

Data from 31 federally qualified health center (FQHC) clinics in Missouri from 2011-2023 were analyzed. A sample of 37,994 unique eligible patients were identified. Simple statistics characterize the sample, while bivariate analyses assess differences in screening types by month.

Results:

In the post COVID-19 era, from 2021 to 2023, colonoscopy testing remained stable with about one third of patients (38%) completing this test. Whereas FIT-DNA increased (16% to 26%) and FIT/FOBT decreased (46% to 35%). Completion of CRC screening yielded statistically significant differences for patients completing the different types of CRC screening by month. For patients who received a colonoscopy (n=7,850), October – January were the highest months for screening, while February-April was the lowest. For FIT/FOBT (n=6,818), March-August was higher whereas December-February were the lowest screening months. For FIT-DNA (n=2,663), March was the most popular month followed by April, May and November, with January the lowest month of testing.

Conclusions:

Home-based tests are more popular than the gold standard, colonoscopy. However, variation of screening over the course of a year suggests under-utilized CRC screening efforts and therefore less than ideal patient care. Months with lower rates of screening for each type of CRC test represent opportunities for improving CRC screening.


 Citation

Please cite as:

McElroy JA, Smith JB, Everett KD

Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e64809

DOI: 10.2196/64809

PMID: 40106833

PMCID: 11941909

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.