Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2024
Date Accepted: Apr 6, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evolution of Learning Styles in Surgery Comparing Residents and Teachers: Cross-Sectional Study

Gouvea Silva G, da Silva Costa CD, Cardoso Gonçalves B, Vianney Saldanha Cidrão Nunes L, Santos E, Almeida de Arnaldo Rodriguez Castro N, Abreu de Lima AR, Sabadoto Brienze VM, Oliani AH, André JC

Evolution of Learning Styles in Surgery Comparing Residents and Teachers: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e64767

DOI: 10.2196/64767

PMID: 40340801

PMCID: 12080965

“The Evolution of Learning Styles in Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Residents and Teachers”

  • Gabriela Gouvea Silva; 
  • Carlos Dario da Silva Costa; 
  • Bruno Cardoso Gonçalves; 
  • Luiz Vianney Saldanha Cidrão Nunes; 
  • Emerson Santos; 
  • Natalia Almeida de Arnaldo Rodriguez Castro; 
  • Alba Regina Abreu de Lima; 
  • Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze; 
  • Antônio Hélio Oliani; 
  • Júlio César André

ABSTRACT

Background:

Studies confirm a relationship between learning style and medical career choice in the learning style patterns observed in distinct types of residency programs. Such patterns can also be applied to general surgery, from medical school to the latest stages of training. Aligning teaching strategies with the predominant learning styles in surgical residency programs has the potential to make training more effective.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine the learning styles of general surgery residents and professors in a Brazilian teaching hospital and compare the results with the existing literature.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study conducted in a teaching hospital of a public university in Brazil. Thirty-four general surgery residents of any year of training and 30 professors participated in the study. Participants completed a sociodemographic survey and David Kolb's Learning Style Inventory. It classifies participants into one of four distinct types of learners: accommodating, diverging, assimilating, and converging. Relationship between sociodemographic data and learning styles was analyzed using Fisher's test, adjusted by the Bonferroni method, and the effect size was measured using Cramer's V test.

Results:

The learning style distribution was similar in both groups, with 43,75% diverging, 42,18% accommodating, 10.93% assimilating, and 3.12% converging styles. A significant relationship was found between sex and learning style (p=0.049) and between age and learning style for professors (p=0.029). The effect sizes were strong (0.46) and very strong (0.506), respectively.

Conclusions:

The prevalence of learning styles among general surgery residents and professors at this Brazilian hospital differs from that of previous studies, with a higher proportion of diverging and accommodating learners and a lower proportion of converging learners, pointing to a change in learning styles. Understanding learning styles is important for developing effective and inclusive surgical training programs. Further research with larger and more diverse populations is needed to confirm these results and explore the factors contributing to the observed differences in learning styles.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gouvea Silva G, da Silva Costa CD, Cardoso Gonçalves B, Vianney Saldanha Cidrão Nunes L, Santos E, Almeida de Arnaldo Rodriguez Castro N, Abreu de Lima AR, Sabadoto Brienze VM, Oliani AH, André JC

Evolution of Learning Styles in Surgery Comparing Residents and Teachers: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e64767

DOI: 10.2196/64767

PMID: 40340801

PMCID: 12080965

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.