Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Nursing (no longer under consideration since Jul 23, 2025)

Date Submitted: Jul 24, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 19, 2024 - Oct 14, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Systematic evaluation of an Internet-based health economics study of remote interventions for hypertension

  • 娜 李

ABSTRACT

Background:

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of Internet-based teleinterventions for patients with hypertension and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Internet-based teleinterventions for the management of hypertension.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of Internet-based teleinterventions for patients with hypertension and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Internet-based teleinterventions for the management of hypertension.

Methods:

A computerized search of the literature on health economics studies of remote interventions for hypertensive patients via the Internet in national and international databases was conducted from database construction to March 2023, and a qualitative systematic evaluation was performed by 2 researchers after independently screening the literature, extracting information, and evaluating the risk of bias of included studies. The risk of bias evaluation referred to the entries in the Consensus of Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) list that addressed the risk of bias.

Results:

The final 14 included literature on Internet-based remote blood pressure monitoring systems, mobile applications, and e-mail blood pressure management;7 literature underwent cost-benefit analysis, 3 literature underwent cost-utility analysis, 1 literature underwent cost-effectiveness analysis, and 1 literature underwent both cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis; 2 literature conducted both cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis; A total of 8 studies modeled health economics. all studies used quality-adjusted life-years as the primary output outcome indicator and 88% of the studies considered the intervention cost-effective and concluded that the teleintervention increased Quality-adjusted life years(QALY); there were also cost-effectiveness analysis studies that included systolic blood pressure and blood pressure control rates, new cardiovascular events as health output indicators.An assessment of the included literature based on CHEERS 2022 found that the quality of included studies was high.

Conclusions:

The current study allows to conclude that Internet-based remote intervention for hypertensive patients may be economical and effective in controlling blood pressure levels and improving the quality of life of hypertensive patients. The number of studies on the economics of Internet-based remote interventions for hypertension is high, but the quality of some of them needs to be improved, and there is still a need for higher quality, larger samples, and more standardized health economics evaluation studies to provide evidence for policy makers in the future.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Systematic evaluation of an Internet-based health economics study of remote interventions for hypertension

JMIR Preprints. 24/07/2024:64696

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.64696

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/64696

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.