Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 18, 2024
Date Accepted: May 7, 2026

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/64502

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patient Engagement in a Cardiac Rehabilitation App: Text messages versus app notification nudges

  • Prerna Gupta; 
  • Josh Durfee; 
  • Joy Waughtal; 
  • Dana Fletcher; 
  • Vincenzo B Polsinelli; 
  • Harsh Vathsangam; 
  • Joan F Hilton; 
  • Alexis L Beatty; 
  • P Michael Ho; 
  • Larry A Allen; 
  • Sheana S Bull; 
  • Pamela N Peterson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mobile health interventions have the potential to motivate healthy behaviors. Optimal strategies for engaging patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in mobile health interventions remain unclear.

Objective:

We compare minutes in app by whether patients received text message and app notification nudges or app notification nudges alone.

Methods:

We analyzed data from the ERA-Nudge study, a pragmatic randomized trial conducted at an urban safety-net hospital testing nudges (short messages to elicit behavior change designed using behavioral economics) to enhance CR adherence and log healthy activity. Trial patients were given access to a mobile application (app). Nudges were initially sent as app notifications. Later in the study, patients received nudges as both app notifications and text messages. We compared time in the CR app among patients receiving nudges as app notifications only versus app notifications and text messages. The trial enrolled patients who could engage with messages in either English or Spanish at an urban safety net hospital with a qualifying CR diagnosis and smartphone from May 2019 to May 2023. We describe minutes in app by type of nudge delivery and compare the two approaches using unadjusted and multivariate negative binomial regression over the 12 weeks of CR.

Results:

In total, 223 patients received nudges: 74 app notification only, 149 app and text. Patients receiving only app nudges spent a mean of 167167 minutes in the app and patients receiving text messages and app nudges spent 245306 minutes in the app (Ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0; unadjusted p = 0.02). After adjusting for age category, sex, primary language, CR location (hospital vs. home), and highest education achieved, patients receiving nudges as text messages and app notifications spent approximately 1.8 times as many minutes in the app compared to those getting nudges as app notifications (95% CI: 1.2 to 2.5, p = 0.002).

Conclusions:

Among an urban safety net population, the addition of text message nudges was associated with greater time in app compared to nudges delivered as app notifications only. These findings suggest that text messages may result in greater patient engagement for mobile health interventions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gupta P, Durfee J, Waughtal J, Fletcher D, Polsinelli VB, Vathsangam H, Hilton JF, Beatty AL, Ho PM, Allen LA, Bull SS, Peterson PN

Patient Engagement in a Cardiac Rehabilitation App: Text messages versus app notification nudges

JMIR Preprints. 18/07/2024:64502

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.64502

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/64502

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.