Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 21, 2024
Date Accepted: Dec 15, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Trust and Use of Recommendations for Health Apps Among European Residents: Cross-Sectional Survey

Shokralla M, Willemsen RF, Kasteleyn MJ, Chavannes N, Talboom-Kamp E

Trust and Use of Recommendations for Health Apps Among European Residents: Cross-Sectional Survey

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e64468

DOI: 10.2196/64468

PMID: 41955460

: Trust and use of recommendations for health apps among European residents: Cross-sectional survey

  • Mariam Shokralla; 
  • Romy Fleur Willemsen; 
  • Marise Jeannine Kasteleyn; 
  • Niels Chavannes; 
  • Esther Talboom-Kamp

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a growing recognition of health apps' role in addressing current healthcare system challenges. Over 350,000 health apps are currently available in app stores. Yet, their quality and the robustness of the underlying scientific evidence are known to differ significantly. However, app stores provide nearly no decision support, making it difficult for people to choose the right app. Research about whose advice for health apps European residents use and trust and if they think health apps should be reviewed by the government and rated is scarce.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore whose recommendations about health apps European residents use and trust and if they think the government should review and rate health apps to help them choose.

Methods:

An explorative quantitative study using a tailored online survey was conducted between December 7, 2022, and February 16, 2023. The survey targeted residents from the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine. It was created in lay language and translated into 26 languages. Descriptive statistics were used to describe types of used health apps, used and trusted sources of recommendation, and respondents' thoughts on the government reviewing and rating health apps. Subgroup analyses were conducted using chi-square and Fisher’s independent test. One open-ended question was included to elicit respondents' final thoughts and comments; a thematic analysis was performed.

Results:

The survey was completed by 1228 respondents from 33 European countries; in total, 90% used one or more health apps. COVID-19 apps and activity apps were most frequently used, were the most frequently used (62%, 60%). Disease management, diagnostic, and treatment apps were the least used. Recommendations from family and friends, healthcare professionals, and health authorities were relatively often used (35.3%, 33.6%, and 29.2%). While the recommendations for health apps from healthcare professionals (80%), pharmacists (61%), and a government or health authority (59.9%) were most trusted. In total, 86% of respondents thought the government should review and rate health apps or pay another organization to do so.

Conclusions:

Our survey results indicate that health apps are widely used. Participants trust a healthcare professional to give them a recommendation for health apps. Recommendations for health apps from trusted sources were underutilized, while untrusted sources were used. The results also showed clear support for governments reviewing and rating health apps or commissioning a third party to do so to help their populations choose high-quality ones and empower health professionals to recommend health apps to their patients.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shokralla M, Willemsen RF, Kasteleyn MJ, Chavannes N, Talboom-Kamp E

Trust and Use of Recommendations for Health Apps Among European Residents: Cross-Sectional Survey

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e64468

DOI: 10.2196/64468

PMID: 41955460

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.