Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Jul 18, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 11, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Prerequisites for Cost-Effective Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring: Early Health Economic Analysis

van Steenkiste J, van Dorst P, Dohmen D, Boersma C

Prerequisites for Cost-Effective Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring: Early Health Economic Analysis

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e64386

DOI: 10.2196/64386

PMID: 40340846

PMCID: 12080967

Prerequisites for cost-effective Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring: Insights from an early health economic analysis

  • Job van Steenkiste; 
  • Pim van Dorst; 
  • Daan Dohmen; 
  • Cornelis Boersma

ABSTRACT

Background:

Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring (HBPT) has been proposed to enhance adherence and optimize healthcare delivery, yet its prerequisites for cost-effective implementation remain unclear.

Objective:

This study aims to quantify the potential cost-effectiveness of HBPT and identify prerequisites for cost-effective implementation of HBPT in comparison to standard hypertension management, using an early health economic analysis from a societal perspective.

Methods:

A decision analytic Markov model with a lifetime horizon (30 years) and a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 20,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of HBPT compared to standard of care (SOC). The HBPT intervention was based on an existing HBPT program applied by the Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The model incorporated 12 health states including 7 blood pressure states, cardiovascular (CV) event, recurrent CV event, post recurrent CV event, all-cause death, and cardiovascular disease related death. A hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients was modelled and results were reported in costs, QALYs and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed to identify important variables for cost-effective implementation of HBPT.

Results:

Following the base-case analysis, HBPT was not cost-effective with an ICER of € 20,297 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated that reducing the number of outpatient department (OPD) consultations results in a more favorable ICER. Specifically, reducing the number of OPD consultations to 1.48 annually resulted in an ICER below the WTP threshold. A reduction to an average of 1.18 consultations per year would make HBPT cost saving. Scenario analyses revealed that extending the duration of HBPT's clinical effect to two or three years substantiall y improved the ICER. Additionally, targeting HBPT towards patients aged 64 or below further improved the ICER.

Conclusions:

HBPT could result in cost-effective or even cost-saving outcomes with only minor reductions in OPD consultations. These findings highlight the potential of HBPT to transform hypertension management by replacing traditional hypertension management with more efficient care using remote patient monitoring. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

van Steenkiste J, van Dorst P, Dohmen D, Boersma C

Prerequisites for Cost-Effective Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring: Early Health Economic Analysis

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e64386

DOI: 10.2196/64386

PMID: 40340846

PMCID: 12080967

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.