Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 15, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 6, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Determining Cluster-Specific Differences in the Number of Days Required to Reliably Predict Habitual Physical Activity: Intraclass Correlation Resampling Analysis

Murphy C, Jouan G, Friðgeirsdóttir K, Islind A, Saavedra J, Óskarsdóttir M, Arnardóttir E

Determining Cluster-Specific Differences in the Number of Days Required to Reliably Predict Habitual Physical Activity: Intraclass Correlation Resampling Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e64323

DOI: 10.2196/64323

PMID: 41666367

PMCID: 12933169

Determining cluster-specific differences in the number of days required to reliably predict habitual physical activity: An intraclass correlation resampling analysis

  • Conor Murphy; 
  • Gabriel Jouan; 
  • Katrin Friðgeirsdóttir; 
  • Anna Islind; 
  • Jose Saavedra; 
  • María Óskarsdóttir; 
  • Erna Arnardóttir

ABSTRACT

Background:

Previous research has attempted to determine the minimum number of days of accelerometry required to reliably reflect an individual’s physical activity. However, human behaviors on a day-to-day basis can be highly variable. As a consequence, the number of days required to reliably predict habitual physical activity is dependent on the variability that exists within an individual. There is a concern that adopting generic recommendations from previous research could provide unreliable estimates.

Objective:

Thus, the main aim of this study was to determine if the number of days of accelerometry data required to reliably estimate short- (7 days) and medium-term (28 days) physical activity differed between clusters of individuals with distinct physical activity patterns.

Methods:

Accelerometry data was collected from 258 participants using the Withings Scanwatch. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was used to identify clusters of individuals based on their physical activity. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of step count were then calculated within each physical activity cluster. A series of ICCs were computed by separately comparing the average step count across the full periods (7 and 28, for the short- and medium-term analysis, respectively) to a series of averaged subsamples (ranging from 1–6 days and 1–27 days, for the short- and medium-term analysis, respectively). For each subsample, 500 random combinations were generated and compared, providing a distribution of ICCs for each subsample.

Results:

To achieve a mean ICC score greater than or equal to 0.80, using all randomized combinations, the number of days ranged from 2 to 6 days depending on the physical activity cluster, for the short-term analysis. For the medium-term analysis, the range was 6 to 11 days.

Conclusions:

Physical activity patterns influence the number of days required to estimate habitual physical activity. Thus, to avoid unreliable estimates of physical activity, researchers should be mindful of the physical activity patterns of their sample.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Murphy C, Jouan G, Friðgeirsdóttir K, Islind A, Saavedra J, Óskarsdóttir M, Arnardóttir E

Determining Cluster-Specific Differences in the Number of Days Required to Reliably Predict Habitual Physical Activity: Intraclass Correlation Resampling Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e64323

DOI: 10.2196/64323

PMID: 41666367

PMCID: 12933169

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.