Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 9, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 9, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 6, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Safety and Efficacy of Modular Digital Psychotherapy for Social Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial

Garvert MM, McFadyen J, Linke S, McCloud T, Meyer SS, Sobanska S, Sharp PB, Long A, Huys QJM, Ahmadi M

Safety and Efficacy of Modular Digital Psychotherapy for Social Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64138

DOI: 10.2196/64138

PMID: 40208666

PMCID: 12022530

Safety and efficacy of a modular digital psychotherapy for social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial

  • Mona Maria Garvert; 
  • Jessica McFadyen; 
  • Stuart Linke; 
  • Tayla McCloud; 
  • Sofie S. Meyer; 
  • Sandra Sobanska; 
  • Paul B. Sharp; 
  • Alex Long; 
  • Quentin J. M. Huys; 
  • Mandana Ahmadi

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social anxiety disorder is a common mental health condition characterized by an intense fear of social situations which can lead to significant impairment in daily life. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been recognized as an effective treatment; however, access to therapists is limited and the fear of interacting with therapists can delay treatment seeking. Furthermore, not all individuals respond. Tailoring modular treatments to individual cognitive profiles may improve efficacy. We developed a novel digital adaptation of CBT for social anxiety that is both modular and fully digital without therapist in the loop and implemented it in the smartphone app Alena.

Objective:

To evaluate the safety, acceptability and efficacy of the new treatment in online participants with symptoms of social anxiety

Methods:

Two online randomized controlled trials comparing individuals with access to the treatment through the app to waitlist. Participants were recruited online and reported Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) total scores >= 30. Primary outcomes were safety and efficacy over 6 weeks in 102 women aged 18-35 (RCT #1) and symptom reduction (Social Phobia Inventory total scores) after 8 weeks in 267 men and women aged 18-75 (RCT #2).

Results:

In RCT #1, active and control arm adverse event frequency and severity was not distinguishable (Intervention: 13.46%; Waitlist: 16%; χ² = 0.007, p = .934). App acceptability was high, with a median completion rate of 90.91% (mean = 76.92%, SD = 29.17%). Secondary outcomes suggested greater symptom reduction in the active (-9.83 ± 12.80) than the control arm (-4.13 ± 11.59, t90 = -2.23, pFDR = .037, Cohen's d = 0.47). RCT #2 replicated these findings. Adverse event frequency was comparable across the two groups (Intervention: 16.13%; Waitlist: 16.80%, χ2 < 0.001; p > .999). Despite a longer treatment program, median completion remained high (84.85%) (mean = 73.83%, SD = 27.89%). SPIN reduction was greater in the active arm (-12.89 ± 13.87) than the control arm (-7.48 ± 12.24, t227 = -3.13, pFDR = .008, Cohen's d = 0.42).

Conclusions:

The online-only, modular social anxiety CBT program appears safe, acceptable and efficacious in two independent RCTs on online patient groups with self-reported symptoms of social anxiety. Clinical Trial: RCT #1: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05858294, RCT #2: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05987969


 Citation

Please cite as:

Garvert MM, McFadyen J, Linke S, McCloud T, Meyer SS, Sobanska S, Sharp PB, Long A, Huys QJM, Ahmadi M

Safety and Efficacy of Modular Digital Psychotherapy for Social Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64138

DOI: 10.2196/64138

PMID: 40208666

PMCID: 12022530

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.