Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jun 28, 2024
Date Accepted: Mar 23, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Self-Determined Health App Evaluation Questionnaire Development: Mixed Methods Study

Rzepka A, Edegger K, Welte S, Bertel D, Mandl A, Schreier G

Self-Determined Health App Evaluation Questionnaire Development: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e63739

DOI: 10.2196/63739

PMID: 40600691

PMCID: 12269797

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Development and Evaluation of a Questionnaire for Self-Determined Evaluation of Health Apps

  • Angelika Rzepka; 
  • Kurt Edegger; 
  • Stefan Welte; 
  • Diotima Bertel; 
  • Anja Mandl; 
  • Günter Schreier

ABSTRACT

Background:

The rapid increase in the number of health Apps and their volatility in (Austrian) App stores for Android and Apple are evidence of a flourishing business sector in the wellness industry.

Objective:

In this report, a checklist for informed decision-making by users was developed and evaluated using health Apps in the categories "Nutrition", "Exercise", "Mental Health" and "Symptom Checker".

Methods:

Evaluation criteria were derived from multiple reference documents and weighted in a survey, as well as a focus group meeting. Further the selected evaluation criteria were tested against selected Apps, which were most popular in the above-mentioned categories in fall 2023.

Results:

The short checklist is to be made publicly available to citizens and covers the categories of regulatory compliance, safety, and quality assurance regarding the quality of the App provider and the functionality and evidence-based content regarding the content quality of the App and the user-friendliness of the App. It comprises of six question items, which Appeared to be problematical in the evaluation most often. For ease of use, a concise checklist with the most critical questions and helpful tips from the evaluation was expanded by the question of importance and with meaningful advice on how to find the right information in an App.

Conclusions:

The evaluation based on the comprehensive checklist using selected Apps confirmed the importance of such a checklist, since most of them lacked basic properties in terms of safety and security.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rzepka A, Edegger K, Welte S, Bertel D, Mandl A, Schreier G

Self-Determined Health App Evaluation Questionnaire Development: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e63739

DOI: 10.2196/63739

PMID: 40600691

PMCID: 12269797

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.