Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Jun 25, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 3, 2024 - Aug 28, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Smartphone Apps for Cardiovascular Care Compared with those for Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital health apps have become more common in patient care; however, regulatory and clinical frameworks for evaluating their key features, effectiveness, and outcomes are lacking.
Objective:
This analysis aims to use a structured evaluation framework to broadly assess current cardiovascular health apps compared with apps applicable to psychiatric conditions.
Methods:
A total of 96 commercially available cardiovascular and mental health apps were randomly sampled. Using the MINDApps framework, key features for apps for each disease category were compared.
Results:
A total of 96 applications were included in the sample of apps screened from the Apple App store and Google Play store (48 from each category). The MINDapps framework, with limited refinement specific to cardiovascular conditions, provided objective assessment of app features similar to its navigation of mental heal apps. Few apps had clear evidence supporting their effectiveness, and most collected data predominantly via survey or patient-reported symptoms with limited utilization of phone-based or external sensors for objective biologic data. While the majority of apps had privacy policies, most also shared patient health information with third parties.
Conclusions:
The current app marketplace rests on a limited clinical foundation, introduces numerous privacy and security concerns, and only lightly implements unique data collection features to increase ease of access. The MIND platform allows for users to better understand which apps to avoid or implement when beginning care plans. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.