Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Education (no longer under consideration since Apr 16, 2025)

Date Submitted: Jun 18, 2024

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Ignoring Reason and Evidence: Factors Influencing Learning Preferences and Modalities Among Clinical Students in a South-South Nigerian Medical School

  • Morufu Olalekan Raimi; 
  • Ebi Bio Awotua-Efebo; 
  • Jackreece Abu Owapiriba; 
  • Adedotun Daniel Adesina; 
  • Abisoye Sunday Oyeyemi; 
  • Aziba-anyam Gift Raimi; 
  • Christopher Ononiwu Elemuwa; 
  • Christopher Ononiwu Elemuwa; 
  • Okechukwu Christian Oginifolunnia

ABSTRACT

Background:

Understanding the preferred learning styles among medical students is crucial for optimizing educational strategies in medical schools. Tailoring teaching methods to align with students' preferred learning modalities enhances engagement, improves knowledge retention, and ultimately prepares students more effectively for clinical practice. This study aims to investigate the predominant learning styles among clinical students at Niger-Delta University (NDU) Amassoma, providing valuable insights into how medical education can be tailored to meet diverse learning needs.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to assess the preferred learning styles among clinical students at NDU Amassoma using the VARK inventory. Specifically, the study seeks to identify the prevalence of visual, auditory, read/write, and kinesthetic learning preferences among students. By achieving this objective, the study aims to inform curriculum developers and educators about the predominant learning styles in order to enhance instructional strategies and improve learning outcomes in medical education.

Methods:

A quantitative cross-sectional study design was employed. The study population comprised clinical students in years 4, 5, and 6 at NDU Amassoma. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic questions and the VARK inventory version 7.8. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics to summarize demographic characteristics and learning style preferences, as well as inferential statistics to examine associations between variables.

Results:

The study revealed that kinesthetic and auditory learning styles were predominant among clinical students at NDU Amassoma, with a significant proportion of students preferring these modalities. Visual and read/write learning styles were less commonly preferred. Gender and age did not significantly influence learning style preferences among the students.

Conclusions:

Medical students at NDU Amassoma exhibit diverse learning preferences, with kinesthetic and auditory styles being the most dominant. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating varied instructional methods that accommodate different learning styles into the medical curriculum.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Raimi MO, Awotua-Efebo EB, Owapiriba JA, Adesina AD, Oyeyemi AS, Raimi AaG, Elemuwa CO, Elemuwa CO, Oginifolunnia OC

Ignoring Reason and Evidence: Factors Influencing Learning Preferences and Modalities Among Clinical Students in a South-South Nigerian Medical School

JMIR Preprints. 18/06/2024:63404

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.63404

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/63404

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.