Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Jun 18, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 2, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty With ChatGPT in Medical Education: Qualitative Study

Abouammoh N, Alhasan K, Raina R, Malki KA, Aljamaan F, Altamimi I, Muaygil R, Wahabi H, Jamal A, Alhaboob A, Assiri RA, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Eyadhy A, Soliman M, Temsah MH

Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty With ChatGPT in Medical Education: Qualitative Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e63400

DOI: 10.2196/63400

PMID: 39977012

PMCID: 11888024

Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty with ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study in Saudi Arabia

  • Noura Abouammoh; 
  • Khalid Alhasan; 
  • Rupesh Raina; 
  • Khalid A. Malki; 
  • Fadi Aljamaan; 
  • Ibraheem Altamimi; 
  • Ruaim Muaygil; 
  • Hayfaa Wahabi; 
  • Amr Jamal; 
  • Ali Alhaboob; 
  • Rasha Assad Assiri; 
  • Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq; 
  • Ayman Al-Eyadhy; 
  • Mona Soliman; 
  • Mohamad-Hani Temsah

ABSTRACT

Background:

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, there is a growing interest in the potential use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT in medical education. However, there is limited research on the perceptions and experiences of faculty and students with ChatGPT, particularly in Saudi Arabia.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore the knowledge, perceived benefits, concerns, and limitations of using ChatGPT in medical education, among faculty and students at a leading Saudi Arabian university.

Methods:

A qualitative study was conducted, involving focused meetings with medical faculty and students with varying levels of ChatGPT experience. A thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and subthemes emerging from the discussions.

Results:

Participants demonstrated good knowledge of ChatGPT and its functions. The main themes were: (1) knowledge and perception of ChatGPT, and (2) roles of ChatGPT in research and medical education. The perceived benefits included collecting and summarizing information and saving time and effort. However, concerns and limitations centered around the potential lack of critical thinking in the information provided, the ambiguity of references, limitations of access, trust in the output of ChatGPT, and ethical concerns.

Conclusions:

This study provides valuable insights into the perceptions and experiences of medical faculty and students regarding the use of ChatGPT in medical education. While the benefits of ChatGPT were recognized, participants also expressed concerns and limitations requiring further studies for effective integration into medical education, exploring the impact of ChatGPT on learning outcomes, student and faculty satisfaction, and the development of critical thinking skills.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Abouammoh N, Alhasan K, Raina R, Malki KA, Aljamaan F, Altamimi I, Muaygil R, Wahabi H, Jamal A, Alhaboob A, Assiri RA, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Eyadhy A, Soliman M, Temsah MH

Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty With ChatGPT in Medical Education: Qualitative Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e63400

DOI: 10.2196/63400

PMID: 39977012

PMCID: 11888024

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.