Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 17, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 21, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Improving Digital Cancer Care for Older Black Adults: Qualitative Study

Wankah P, Chandra S, Lofters A, Mohamednur N, Osei B, Makuwaza T, Sayani A

Improving Digital Cancer Care for Older Black Adults: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63324

DOI: 10.2196/63324

PMID: 39970422

PMCID: 11888062

Improving virtual cancer care for older Black adults: A qualitative study

  • Paul Wankah; 
  • Shivani Chandra; 
  • Aisha Lofters; 
  • Nebila Mohamednur; 
  • Beverley Osei; 
  • Tutsirai Makuwaza; 
  • Ambreen Sayani

ABSTRACT

Background:

Health systems are rapidly promoting virtual cancer care models to improve cancer care of their populations. However, virtual cancer care can exacerbate inequities in cancer care for communities experiencing social disadvantaged. Older Black cancer patients face unique challenges to accessing and utilizing virtual cancer care.

Objective:

This study focused on understanding the virtual cancer care experience of older Black patients, their caregivers and healthcare providers to identify strategies that can better support patient-centered virtual cancer care.

Methods:

A theory-informed thematic analysis was conducted using data collected from six focus groups (N = 55 participants) conducted across ten Canadian provinces. Data coding and thematic analysis was informed by the Patient Centered Care model and the synergies of oppression conceptual lens.

Results:

Five overarching themes describe the experience of older Black patients, caregivers and health care providers in accessing and utilizing virtual cancer care: i) heightened inequities at the intersection of multiple systems of oppression; ii) shifting caregivers’ dynamics; iii) autonomy of choice and choosing based on the purpose of care; iv) digital accessibility and v) effective digital communication. We identify eight barriers and six facilitators to optimal virtual cancer for older Black adults. Barriers include limited digital literacy, linguistic barriers in traditional African/Caribbean languages, and culturally mediated views of patients; and facilitators include community-based cancer support groups, caregivers support and key features of digital technologies.

Conclusions:

A multipronged approach that simultaneously focuses on addressing barriers and leveraging community strengths can improve access and utilization of virtual cancer care. A redesign of virtual cancer care programs, tailored to the needs of most structurally marginalized groups like older Black adults can enhance the virtual care experience for all population groups. Public policies and organizational practices that address issues like availability of internet in remote areas, resources to support linguistic barriers or culturally sensitive training are important in responding to the complexity of access to virtual cancer care. These findings have implications for other structurally marginalized and underserved communities that have suboptimal access and utilization of virtual care. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wankah P, Chandra S, Lofters A, Mohamednur N, Osei B, Makuwaza T, Sayani A

Improving Digital Cancer Care for Older Black Adults: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63324

DOI: 10.2196/63324

PMID: 39970422

PMCID: 11888062

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.