Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Jun 15, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 6, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Development of a Fair Machine Learning Model

Carbunaru S, Neshatvar Y, Do H, Murray K, Ranganath R, Nayan M

Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Development of a Fair Machine Learning Model

JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e63289

DOI: 10.2196/63289

PMID: 39671594

PMCID: 11694706

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Development of a Fair Machine Learning Model to Predict Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

  • Samuel Carbunaru; 
  • Yassamin Neshatvar; 
  • Hyungrok Do; 
  • Katie Murray; 
  • Rajesh Ranganath; 
  • Madhur Nayan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Prediction models based on machine learning (ML) methods are being increasingly developed and adopted in healthcare. However, these models may be prone to bias and be considered unfair if they demonstrate variable performance in population subgroups. An unfair model is of particular concern in bladder cancer where disparities have been identified in sex and race subgroups.

Objective:

In this study, we developed a ML model to predict survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, and evaluated for potential model bias in sex and race subgroups. We then compared algorithm unfairness mitigation techniques to improve model fairness.

Methods:

We trained and compared various ML classification algorithms to predict 5-year survival after radical cystectomy using the National Cancer Database. The primary model performance metric was the F1 score. The primary metric for model fairness was the equalized odds ratio (eOR). We compared three algorithm unfairness mitigating techniques to improve the eOR.

Results:

We identified 16,481 patients; 23.1% were female; 91.5% were ‘White’, 5.0% were ‘Black’, 2.3% were ‘Hispanic’, and 1.2% were ‘Asian’. The 5-year mortality rate was 74.6%. The best naive model was XGBoost which had an F1 score of 0.860 and eOR of 0.619. All unfairness mitigation techniques increased the eOR, with correlation remover showing the highest increase and resulting in a final eOR of 0.750. This mitigated model had F1 scores of 0.86, 0.904, and 0.824 in the full, Black male, and Asian female test sets, respectively.

Conclusions:

Our ML model predicting survival after radical cystectomy exhibited bias across sex and race subgroups. By employing algorithm unfairness mitigation techniques, we improved algorithmic fairness as measured by the eOR.Our study highlights the role of evaluating for model bias but also actively mitigating such disparities to ensure equitable healthcare delivery. We also deploy the first online fair ML model predicting survival after radical cystectomy at https://nayanlab.shinyapps.io/fair_cystectomy_survival/.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Carbunaru S, Neshatvar Y, Do H, Murray K, Ranganath R, Nayan M

Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Development of a Fair Machine Learning Model

JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e63289

DOI: 10.2196/63289

PMID: 39671594

PMCID: 11694706

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.