Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jun 7, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 13, 2024
Public Perceptions of Very Low Nicotine Content (VLNC) on Twitter/X: Observational Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Nicotine is a highly addictive agent in tobacco products. On June 21, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a plan to propose a rule to establish a maximum nicotine level in cigarettes and other combusted tobacco products.
Objective:
This study aims to understand public perception and discussion of VLNC (Very Low Nicotine Content) on Twitter/X.
Methods:
From December 12, 2021, to January 1, 2023, we collected Twitter/X data using relevant keywords such as “vln”, “low nicotine”, and “reduced nicotine”. After a series of pre-processing steps (such as removing duplicates, retweets, and commercial tweets), we identified 3,270 unique non-commercial tweets related to VLNC. We used an inductive method to assess the public perception and discussion of VLNC on Twitter/X. To establish a codebook, we randomly selected 300 tweets for hand-coding, including the attitudes (positive, neutral, and negative) toward VLNC and major topics (14 topics). The Cohen’s Kappa statistic between the two human coders reached over 70%, indicating a substantial interrater agreement. The rest of the tweets were single-coded according to the codebook.
Results:
We observed a significant peak in the discussion of VLNC on Twitter/X within four days of the FDA’s announcement of the proposed rule on June 21, 2022. The proportion of tweets with a negative attitude towards VLNC was significantly higher than those with a positive attitude, 32.45% (1,061/3,270) vs. 28.99% (948/3,270) with a P-value of 0.003 from the two-proportion Z-test. Among tweets with a positive attitude, the topic “Help smoking or vaping cessation” is dominant (53.69%, 509/948). Among tweets with a negative attitude, the topic “Same or more toxic of VLNC” is the most popular topic (21.49%, 228/1,061), followed by “VLNC leads to more smoking” (20.36%, 216/1,061), “Other” (18.10%, 192/1,061), and “VLNC is not a good method for quitting smoking” (17.44%, 185/1,061).
Conclusions:
There is a more negative attitude toward VLNC than a positive attitude on Twitter/X, resulting from different opinions about VLNC. Discussions around VLNC mainly focused on whether VLNC could help quit smoking and its toxicity.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.