Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jun 4, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 6, 2024 - Aug 1, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 16, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Impact of Skin Pigmentation on Pulse Oximetry SpO2 and Wearable Pulse Rate Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a technology routinely used in clinical practice to assess blood oxygenation (SpO2) and pulse rate (PR). Skin pigmentation may influence accuracy, leading to health outcomes disparities.
Objective:
This meta-analysis primarily aimed to evaluate the accuracy of PPG-derived SpO2 and PR by skin pigmentation. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate statistical biases and the clinical relevance of PPG-derived SpO2 and PR according to skin pigmentation.
Methods:
We identified 23 pulse oximetry studies (N=59,684; 197,353 paired SpO2-arterial blood observations) and 4 wearable PR studies (N=176; 140,771 paired photoplethysmography-electrocardiography observations). We evaluated accuracy according to skin pigmentation group by comparing SpO2 accuracy root-mean-square (Arms) values to the regulatory threshold of 3% and PR 95% limits of agreement (LoA) values to ±5 bpm, according to the standards of the American National Standards Institute, Advancing Safety in Medical Technology, and the International Electrotechnical Commission. We evaluated biases and clinical relevance using mean bias and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
For SpO2, Arms were 3.96%, 4.71%, and 4.15% and pooled mean biases were 0.70% (95% CI: 0.17 to 1.22), 0.27% (95% CI: -0.64 to 1.19), and 1.27% (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.95) for light, medium, and dark pigmentation, respectively. For PR, 95% LoAs were -16.02 to 13.54, -18.62 to 16.84, and -33.69 to 32.54 and pooled mean biases were -1.24 bpm (95% CI: -5.31-2.83), -0.89 bpm (95% CI: -3.70-1.93), and -0.57 bpm (95% CI: -9.44-8.29) for light, medium, and dark pigmentation, respectively.
Conclusions:
SpO2 and PR measurements may be inaccurate across all skin pigmentation groups, breaching FDA guidance and industry standards thresholds. Pulse oximeters significantly overestimate SpO2 for both light and dark skin pigmentation, but this overestimation may not be clinically relevant. PRs obtained from wearables exhibit no statistically or clinically significant bias based on skin pigmentation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.