Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 29, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: May 29, 2024 - Jul 24, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 20, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing Digital Phenotyping for App Recommendations and Sustained Engagement: Cohort Study

Dwyer B, Flathers M, Burns J, Mikkelson J, Perlmutter E, Chen K, Ram N, Torous J

Assessing Digital Phenotyping for App Recommendations and Sustained Engagement: Cohort Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e62725

DOI: 10.2196/62725

PMID: 39560976

PMCID: 11615540

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessing Digital Phenotyping for App Recommendations and Sustained Engagement: A Pilot Study

  • Bridget Dwyer; 
  • Matthew Flathers; 
  • James Burns; 
  • Jane Mikkelson; 
  • Elana Perlmutter; 
  • Kelly Chen; 
  • Nanik Ram; 
  • John Torous

ABSTRACT

Background:

Low engagement with mental health apps continues to limit their impact. New approaches to helping match patients to the right app may increase engagement by ensuring the app they are using is best suited to their mental health needs.

Objective:

This study piloted how digital phenotyping, using data from smartphone sensors to infer symptom, behavioral and functional outcomes, could be used to match people to mental health apps and potentially increase engagement

Methods:

After one week of collecting digital phenotyping data with the mindLAMP app, participants were randomized to feedback and recommendations based on that data for selecting one of four predetermined mental health apps (related to mood, anxiety, sleep, fitness) or in the control arm, selecting the same apps but without any feedback or recommendations. All participants used their selected app for 4 weeks with numerous metrics of engagement recorded including objective screentime measures, self reported engagement measures, and Digital Working Alliance Inventory scores. The study offered participants no compensation.

Results:

82 enrolled in the study and 17 dropped out of the digital phenotyping arm and 18 from the control arm. Across both groups, few participants chose or were recommended the insomnia or fitness app. The majority 78.7% used a depression or anxiety app. Engagement as measured by objective screen time and Digital Working Alliance Inventory scores were higher in the digital phenotyping arm. There was no correlation between self-reported and objective metrics of app use. Qualitative results highlighted the importance of habit formation in sustained app use.

Conclusions:

Results suggest that digital phenotyping app recommendation is feasible and may increase engagement. This approach is generalizable to other apps beyond the four selected for use in this pilot, and practical for real-world use given the study was conducted without any compensation or external incentives that may have biased results. Advances in digital phenotyping will likely make this method of app recommendation more personalized and thus of even greater interest.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dwyer B, Flathers M, Burns J, Mikkelson J, Perlmutter E, Chen K, Ram N, Torous J

Assessing Digital Phenotyping for App Recommendations and Sustained Engagement: Cohort Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e62725

DOI: 10.2196/62725

PMID: 39560976

PMCID: 11615540

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.