Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: May 20, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 5, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Acceptance of Virtual Reality in Trainees Using a Technology Acceptance Model: Survey Study

Wang E, Qian D, Zhang L, Li B, Ko B, Khoury M, Renavikar M, Ganesan A, Caruso T

Acceptance of Virtual Reality in Trainees Using a Technology Acceptance Model: Survey Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e60767

DOI: 10.2196/60767

PMID: 39727193

PMCID: 11693781

Acceptance of Virtual Reality in Trainees Using a Technology Acceptance Model

  • Ellen Wang; 
  • Daniel Qian; 
  • Lijin Zhang; 
  • Brian Li; 
  • Brian Ko; 
  • Michael Khoury; 
  • Meghana Renavikar; 
  • Avani Ganesan; 
  • Thomas Caruso

ABSTRACT

Background:

Virtual reality (VR) technologies have demonstrated therapeutic usefulness across a variety of healthcare settings. However, graduate medical education (GME) trainee perspectives on VR acceptability and usability are limited.

Objective:

The primary aim of this study was to apply a hybrid technology acceptance model (TAM)/United Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to evaluate factors that predict the behavioral intentions of GME trainees to use VR for patient anxiolysis. The secondary aim was to assess the reliability of the TAM/UTAUT.

Methods:

Participants were surveyed in June 2023. GME trainees participated in a VR experience used to reduce perioperative anxiety. Participants then completed a survey evaluating demographics, perceptions, attitudes, environmental factors, and behavioral intentions that influence adoption of new technologies.

Results:

202 of 1540 GME trainees participated. 198 participants were included in the final analysis (12.9% participation rate). Perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, and enjoyment, social influence and facilitating conditions predicted intention to use VR. Age, past use, price willing to pay, and curiosity were less strong predictors of intention to use. All confirmatory factor analysis models demonstrated good fit. All domain measurements demonstrated acceptable reliability.

Conclusions:

This TAM/UTAUT demonstrated validity and reliability for predicting GME trainees’ behavioral intentions to use VR as a therapeutic anxiolytic in clinical practice. Social influence and facilitating conditions are modifiable factors that present opportunities to advance VR adoption, such as fostering exposure to new technologies and offering relevant training and social encouragement. Future investigations should study the model’s reliability within specialties in different geographic locations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang E, Qian D, Zhang L, Li B, Ko B, Khoury M, Renavikar M, Ganesan A, Caruso T

Acceptance of Virtual Reality in Trainees Using a Technology Acceptance Model: Survey Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e60767

DOI: 10.2196/60767

PMID: 39727193

PMCID: 11693781

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.