Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: May 17, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 12, 2024 - Aug 7, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 13, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Completion Rate and Satisfaction With Online Computer-Assisted History Taking Questionnaires in Orthopedics: Multicenter Implementation Report

Craamer C, Timmers T, Siebelt M, Kool RB, Diekerhof C, Caron JJ, Gosens T, van der Weegen W

Completion Rate and Satisfaction With Online Computer-Assisted History Taking Questionnaires in Orthopedics: Multicenter Implementation Report

JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e60655

DOI: 10.2196/60655

PMID: 39622699

PMCID: 11611801

Completion rate and satisfaction with online Computer Assisted History Taking questionnaires in Orthopedics: A Multicenter Implementation Report.

  • Casper Craamer; 
  • Thomas Timmers; 
  • Michiel Siebelt; 
  • Rudolf Bertijn Kool; 
  • Carel Diekerhof; 
  • Jan Jacob Caron; 
  • Taco Gosens; 
  • Walter van der Weegen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Collecting the medical history during a first outpatient consultation plays a crucial role in making a diagnosis. However, it is a time-consuming process while time is scarce in today’s healthcare environment. Computer Assisted History Taking (CAHT) systems allow patients to share their medical history electronically before their visit. Although multiple advantages of CAHT have been demonstrated, adoption in everyday medical practice remains low. This has been attributed to various barriers.

Objective:

To implement a CAHT-questionnaire for orthopedic patients in preparation to their first outpatient consultation.

Methods:

A multi-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in which all patients who were referred to the orthopedic department were invited to self-complete the CAHT-questionnaire. The primary outcome of the study is the completion rate to the questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included patient’s and physician’s satisfaction. These were assessed via surveys and semi-structured interviews.

Results:

In total, 5,321 patients were invited and 4,932 (92.3%) fully completed the CAHT-questionnaire. Participants (n=224) rated the easiness to complete the questionnaire with an 8.0 (0-10 scale, SD 1.9) and an 8.0 (0-10 scale, SD 1.7) on satisfaction of the consult. Satisfaction with the outpatient consultation was higher in case the given answers were used by the orthopedic surgeon during this consultation (8.3 IQR 8.0-9.1 versus 8.0 IQR 7.0-8.5, p<.001). Physician’s (n=15) scored the added value as 7.8 (0-10 scale, SD 1.7) and unanimously recognized increased efficiency, better patient engagement and medical record completeness. Implementing the patient’s answers into the EHR was deemed necessary.

Conclusions:

In this study, we have shown that previously recognized barriers to implementing and adapting CAHT can now be effectively overcome. We demonstrated that almost all patients completed the CAHT-questionnaire. This results in reported improvements in both the efficiency and personalization of outpatient consultations. Given the pressing need for personalized healthcare delivery in today’s time-constrained medical environment, we recommend implementing CAHT-systems in routine medical practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Craamer C, Timmers T, Siebelt M, Kool RB, Diekerhof C, Caron JJ, Gosens T, van der Weegen W

Completion Rate and Satisfaction With Online Computer-Assisted History Taking Questionnaires in Orthopedics: Multicenter Implementation Report

JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e60655

DOI: 10.2196/60655

PMID: 39622699

PMCID: 11611801

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.