Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: May 7, 2024
Date Accepted: Mar 29, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Post D, Whitson K, Parfitt G

Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e60297

DOI: 10.2196/60297

PMID: 40354634

PMCID: 12088610

Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: a Mixed Methods Evaluation

  • Dannielle Post; 
  • Kathleen Whitson; 
  • Gaynor Parfitt

ABSTRACT

Background:

Australia’s aging population is looking to “age in place”, accessing care alternatives external to the traditional model of residential aged care facilities. This evaluation is situated in a Social Day Program (SDP) designed to cater for people living with dementia, located in an environment equipped with new technologies including, age-specific interactive computer gaming, social robots, sensory stimulation, and virtual reality. The technologies are designed to support older adults, enabling them to stay connected and maintain physical and cognitive functioning, independence, and quality of life.

Objective:

The aim of the project was to undertake a multi-faceted evaluation of the implementation of the new technologies, including an exploration of the barriers and enablers to uptake. The key issue is how to enhance the potential for optimising use of these technologies in the SDP environment, to help inform decision-making regarding the implementation of these technologies at other sites, and future investment in such technologies by aged care organisations.

Methods:

Observation of technology use within the organisation was conducted over a 16-week period. Surveys and semi-structured interviews were used to collect information from SDP clients, their family members, and staff, related to their experiences with the technology. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interviews. Data were triangulated across the sample.

Results:

Forty-eight observation periods were completed, totalling 126.5 observation hours. Four interviews were completed with clients. Four family members completed the survey and an interview. Nineteen staff completed surveys and twelve staff participated in an interview. Nearly three quarters (n=14) of the staff perceived there to be barriers to the clients’ use of technology. Key themes identified related to Perceptions of technology use; How and why technology is used; Staff knowledge of technology; Perceived barriers to technology use; and Perceived enablers of technology use.

Conclusions:

This evaluation identified that technology was not being used as extensively as initially intended, nor for the purposes of enrichment or experience enhancement. Multiple barriers to implementation and sustained use of the technology items were identified, and recommendations to improve implementation and promote sustained use of the technology were made. The next steps are to examine application of the recommendations and ongoing use of technology, and its impact, within the organisation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Post D, Whitson K, Parfitt G

Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e60297

DOI: 10.2196/60297

PMID: 40354634

PMCID: 12088610

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.