Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: May 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Dec 1, 2024
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 7, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Follow up of patients with chronic pain using an app with a support center: unicenter prospective study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Lower back pain is one of the most prevalent diseases, and should be treated with a multidisciplinary approach, being a possibility the use of spinal cord stimulation. These patients need a close follow up that cannot always be guaranteed, with new technologies helping in that regard. We designed a remote follow up system based on a mobile phone app for the patient, a web for professionals, and a remote support center.
Objective:
To evaluate patient adherence to follow up using a system with phone app and a remote support center.
Methods:
After reviewing the literature and approval in a multidisciplinary committee, a group of experts designed a follow up system based on a mobile phone app, a web for professionals and a remote support center. The system was designed with medical professionals involved, sending validated scales to obtain patients’ clinical information through every phase of the implantation (pre-treatment phase, trial phase and implantation phase). Data was collected prospectively from annuary 2020 to august 2023, considering total surveys sent and surveys answered to, in addition to reminders sent.
Results:
A total of 64 patients were included (40 female, 62’5%). At the end of the study, 19 patients were in the pre-treatment phase (29’7%), 8 patients achieved the trial phase (12’5%) and 37 achieved the implantation phase (57’8%). The follow up time was 15’30 +/- 9’43 months (mean +/- SD). A total of 1574 surveys were sent, with a total of 488 sms and 53 calls to remind the patients to answer the surveys. Adherence rates decreased from 94’53% in pre-treatment phase to 65’68% in implantation phase, being the global adherence to the use of the app 87’37%. In the ANOVA analysis, the adherence was proved better the earlier phase the patient was in (p>0’001).
Conclusions:
Our remote follow up system with a remote support center provides better adherence to follow up, even if the adherence tends to decrease over time. More studies are needed to correlate app adherence with pain control.
Citation
The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.