Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since May 03, 2024)

Date Submitted: May 2, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: May 3, 2024 - May 3, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Voice Analysis and Deep Learning for Detecting Mental Disorders in Pregnant Women: A Cross-sectional Study

  • Hikaru Ooba; 
  • Jota Maki; 
  • Hisashi Masuyama

ABSTRACT

Background:

Screening for mental disorders in pregnant women is crucial, but traditional tools such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) or Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI18) lack objectivity. Voice analysis and AI show promise in identifying specific mental disorders; however, existing research focuses on general depression, neglecting other disorders in pregnant women.

Objective:

This study explored the use of an image classification model to detect vocal patterns and identify mental disorders in pregnant women.

Methods:

This prospective cohort study was conducted in Japan with 204 pregnant women attending a one-month postnatal checkup. The study involved voice recordings during interviews, supplemented by sociodemographic data and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores. Voice samples were cleaned to remove environmental noise and other voices, then segmented and converted into spectrograms. Data augmentation techniques were employed to enhance training data diversity, and Efficientformer V2, pretrained with transfer learning, was used for categorization. Hyperparameters were optimized using Optuna, and an ensemble learning approach was used for final classifications, which were compared against the EPDS.

Results:

Of the 204 pregnant women enrolled, 32 were excluded due to inadequate data, resulting in 172 participants. The participants were divided into three groups: 97 for training, 32 for validation, and 43 for testing. The average audio duration was approximately 549.2±356.0 s. The segmented data yielded 2,942 training, 197 validation, and 323 test segments. After data expansion, the number of training segments increased to 14,170. Various hyperparameters were set for machine learning. The ensemble predictions displayed higher sensitivity (1.00) and recall (0.82) for vocal discrimination and higher specificity (0.97) and precision (0.84) for EPDS discrimination. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve comparison revealed no significant difference (p = 0.759).

Conclusions:

Voice analysis and artificial intelligence may provide better screening methods for detecting mental disorders during pregnancy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ooba H, Maki J, Masuyama H

Voice Analysis and Deep Learning for Detecting Mental Disorders in Pregnant Women: A Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Preprints. 02/05/2024:60130

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.60130

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/60130

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.