Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Apr 28, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 21, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021 (Pre-Dobbs): Cross-Sectional Study

Swartzendruber A, Luisi N, Johnson E, Lambert DN

Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021 (Pre-Dobbs): Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e60001

DOI: 10.2196/60001

PMID: 39504544

PMCID: 11579622

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021

  • Andrea Swartzendruber; 
  • Nicole Luisi; 
  • Erin Johnson; 
  • Danielle Nicole Lambert

ABSTRACT

Background:

Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are religious non-profit organizations that have a primary mission of diverting people from having abortions. For decades, one tactic used by CPCs has been to locate near abortion facilities. Despite medical groups’ warnings that CPCs do not adhere to medical and ethical standards and pose risks to individual and public health, government support for CPCs has significantly increased over the past decade.

Objective:

This study aimed to map CPCs, abortion facilities, and geographic areas in the United States (US) categorized into four zones defined by their proximity to CPCs and abortion facilities in 2021. We also sought to describe the number and percentage of reproductive-aged women living in each zone and the proximity of CPCs to abortion facilities.

Methods:

Using 2021 data from CPC Map and the Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) Abortion Facility Database, we determined the ratio of CPCs to abortion facilities. Using these sources and Census data, we categorized and mapped US block groups into four distinct zones based on the locations of block group centroids within 15-mile radii of CPCs and abortion facilities: 1) no presence, 2) CPC only, 3) abortion facility only, and 4) dual presence. We used summary statistics to calculate the number and percentage of block groups and reproductive-aged (15-49 years) women living in each zone. We also calculated distances and drive times from abortion facilities to the nearest CPC. All analyses were conducted nationally and by region, division, and state. We used chi-square statistics to test for differences by region and division in the number of block groups and women classified to each zone.

Results:

Nationally, the ratio of CPCs to abortion facilities was 3.4, and 55% of block groups were categorized in the “dual presence” zone, 27% as “CPC only,” and 0.8% in the “abortion facility only” zone. Most (60%) reproductive-aged women lived in a “dual presence” zone, 26% in a “CPC only”, and 0.8% lived in an “abortion facility only” zone. We detected statistically significant variations (p<0.001) in the number of block groups and women classified as living in each zone by region and division. Nationally, the median distance from abortion facilities to the nearest CPC was 2 miles, and the median drive time was 5.5 minutes. Minimum drive times were <1 minute in all but 11 states.

Conclusions:

The findings suggest that CPCs’ tactic of locating near abortion facilities was largely realized before the 2022 US Supreme Court decision that overturned the federal right to abortion. Research on CPCs’ locations and tactics should continue given the dynamic abortion policy landscape and risks posed by CPCs. Tailored programming to raise awareness about CPCs and help people identify and access safe sources of healthcare may mitigate harm.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Swartzendruber A, Luisi N, Johnson E, Lambert DN

Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021 (Pre-Dobbs): Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e60001

DOI: 10.2196/60001

PMID: 39504544

PMCID: 11579622

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.