Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 11, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians’ Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: Survey Study

Su J, Shen KN, Guo X

Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians’ Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e59904

DOI: 10.2196/59904

PMID: 39612484

PMCID: 11661403

Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians’ Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: A Survey Study

  • Jingyuan Su; 
  • Kathy Ning Shen; 
  • Xitong Guo

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital platforms provide a venue for patients and physicians for health knowledge exchange, consultation, and services beyond the traditional medical systems. Such platforms also alter the relationships between patients and physicians where patients are more empowered and physicians require further motivation for voluntary knowledge sharing. However, most prior studies assume the leading role of physicians in such exchange but overlook the potential influence of patients.

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate the effect of patient-empowering behavior (PEB) on physicians’ online knowledge sharing (OKS) and revealed the potential platform contingency for physicians’ proactivity in knowledge sharing.

Methods:

Based on the proactive motivational model and empowerment theory, we argued for a reverse empowerment process from patients to physicians. We hypothesized that PEB could drive physicians’ OKS by enhancing their proactive motivational states, i.e., knowledge-sharing self-efficacy (KSE), sharing meaning (SM), and positive professional affect (PPA). Platform extrinsic rewards (PER) could moderate the impact of physicians’ proactivity. The research was validated by a survey study involving 257 physicians and the partial least square was performed to analyze the data.

Results:

Perceived PEB has a significant positive impact on physicians’ OKS (β=0.27, t225=4.264, P<.001). The mediation analysis showed that KSE (Effect=0.06, t225=2.41, P=.02), SM (Effect=0.14, t225=4.34, P<.001), and PPA (Effect=0.09, t225=2.73, P=.006) each partially mediated the effect of PEB on OKS, and the three proactive motivational states played a complete mediation effect, as indicated through a significant indirect effect (Effect=0.29, t225=5.63, P<.001), but not direct effect (Effect=0.06, t225=0.91, P=.36). Meanwhile, PER significantly mitigated the effect of SM on OKS (β=-0.12, t225=2.98, P=.003) only.

Conclusions:

The study is the first attempt to reveal the active role of patients to empower physicians on digital platforms and investigate the mechanism of proactivity for physicians’ OKS. The results entail significant contributions to existing empowerment, e-health, and proactive behavior literature. The findings also provide valuable guidance for the sustainability of digital platforms for healthcare.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Su J, Shen KN, Guo X

Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians’ Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e59904

DOI: 10.2196/59904

PMID: 39612484

PMCID: 11661403

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.