Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 23, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Choosing the Best Digital Health Literacy Measure for Research: Mixed Methods Study

Thorup CB, Uitto M, Butler-Henderson K, Wamala-Andersson S, Hoffrén-Mikkola M, Thoft DS, Høsum LKE, Irrazabal MG, González LP, Valkama K

Choosing the Best Digital Health Literacy Measure for Research: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e59807

DOI: 10.2196/59807

PMID: 40198098

PMCID: 12015337

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Choosing the best digital health literacy measure for your research – recommendations based upon a literature review and Champions involvement process.

  • Charlotte Brun Thorup; 
  • Mika Uitto; 
  • Kerryn Butler-Henderson; 
  • Sarah Wamala-Andersson; 
  • Merja Hoffrén-Mikkola; 
  • Diana Schack Thoft; 
  • Lisa Korsbakke Emtekær Høsum; 
  • María Gabriela Irrazabal; 
  • Laura Pruneda González; 
  • Katja Valkama

ABSTRACT

Background:

The global demographic shift towards longer life expectancy and complex health needs is increasing the number of people with chronic diseases, placing pressure on health and care systems. With the digitalization of healthcare, digital Health Literacy (dHL), or the use of digital skills in health, is gaining importance. It involves navigating digital health information, using digital tools effectively, and making informed health decisions. Measuring dHL can help identify gaps and develop strategies to improve dHL and health, ensuring citizens equal opportunity to participate in a digital healthcare system. Based on the European project “The Improving Digital Empowerment for Active and Healthy Living (IDEAHL)” to empower European Union citizens to use digital instruments to take a more active role in managing their health and well-being.

Objective:

This paper AIMs to conduct a critical viewpoint of existing assessment tools for measuring dHL and recommend strategies for choosing relevant assessment tools.

Methods:

This study was carried out as a mixed method study initiated by a scoping review and three additional papers followed by a qualitative workshop study and a final analysis combining results.

Results:

Future tools should adapt to the latest trends and technologies, considering attitudes towards digital health and trust in its services. They should identify beneficiaries of digital health services, measure the impact of dHL interventions, and objectively evaluate functional skills. These tools should be evidence-based, validate instruments, interpret dHL results, and capture diverse experiences to reveal health behaviour changes.

Conclusions:

The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), despite being the most frequently utilized tool, has limitations in scope and adaptability. Future tools need to reflect digital trends, encompassing individual skills. However, it is important to note that the ‘adequacy’ of dHL is context-specific and relies on healthcare systems and the technology provided, particularly the user interface. The focus should be on health improvement, not just elevating dHL levels. A comprehensive approach to dHL assessments, addressing diversity and relevance is crucial. Ethical considerations in dHL, including privacy and data security, are important due to potential feelings of shame among those with low literacy levels.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Thorup CB, Uitto M, Butler-Henderson K, Wamala-Andersson S, Hoffrén-Mikkola M, Thoft DS, Høsum LKE, Irrazabal MG, González LP, Valkama K

Choosing the Best Digital Health Literacy Measure for Research: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e59807

DOI: 10.2196/59807

PMID: 40198098

PMCID: 12015337

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.