Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Apr 12, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 15, 2024 - Jun 10, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 14, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Patient-Facing Mobile App for Biobank Research Transparency and Engagement: Participatory Design
ABSTRACT
Background:
Patient-derived biospecimens are invaluable tools in biomedical research. Currently, there are no mechanisms for patients to follow along and learn about the uses of their donated samples. Incorporating patients as stakeholders and meaningfully engaging them in biomedical research first requires transparency of research activities.
Objective:
Here we describe the process and results of using participatory design methods to build a mobile application in which breast cancer patients could learn about their biospecimens collected for research, the status of their use in research protocols, and about the breast disease biobank collection. This decentralized biobanking application (“de-bi”) provided patient-friendly interfaces overlaying institutional biobank databases.
Methods:
This research occurred in two phases. In Phase 1, we designed app screens containing different information that patients could learn about ongoing research involving their samples. Embedding these screen designs in a survey, we sought to gauge patients’ interests in receiving information about research or about their biospecimens. We engaged some survey respondents in short interviews to discern their views on the importance of having this information and their opinions on its presentation and design. We held a design workshop in which participants gave feedback on the screens and suggested improvements. For Phase 2, we then refined the user interfaces developed a functional app prototype. As we developed the app, we consulted institutional stakeholders to enhance compatibility with regulations and local data architectures. We then presented the app at a second workshop, where participants shared thoughts on usability and design of the app. In this phase we also conducted cognitive walkthroughs with individual participants to measure their success in using the app and to gain in-depth feedback on its functionality.
Results:
Survey and interview participants were interested in learning the status of their donated biospecimens (47%), the outcomes of research done on their specimens (30%), and in connecting with other patients similar to them. A design workshop assessing initial app screens revealed confusion in language and data presentation, though participants wanted to learn about their samples and expressed interest in using an app to do so. A second design workshop and cognitive walkthroughs assessed a functioning mobile app prototype integrated with institutional biobank data. These activities revealed further interest in the ability to track and learn about donated biospecimens. Half of participants struggled with the onboarding process. These results informed updates to the app design and functionality.
Conclusions:
Designing a patient-facing mobile app that displays information about biobanked specimens can facilitate greater transparency and engagement in biomedical research. Co-designing the app with patient stakeholders confirmed interest in learning about biospecimens and related research, improved presentation of data, and ensured usability of the app in preparation for a pilot study.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.