Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Apr 10, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Machine Learning Driven by Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Classification of Alzheimer Disease Progression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Battineni G, Chintalapudi N, Amenta F

Machine Learning Driven by Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Classification of Alzheimer Disease Progression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Aging 2024;7:e59370

DOI: 10.2196/59370

PMID: 39714089

PMCID: 11704653

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Utilizing MRI-Based Machine Learning for Alzheimer's Disease Progression Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Gopi Battineni; 
  • Nalini Chintalapudi; 
  • Francesco Amenta

ABSTRACT

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is diagnosed by categorizing individuals based on the severity of cognitive impairment. This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to assess AD prevalence across different stages utilizing machine learning (ML) approaches. Forest plots were used to depict the prevalence of AD subjects at different stages. According to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, articles were selected in three phases: identification, screening, and final inclusion. For the final analysis, 24 articles that met the selection criteria were identified. ML approaches for AD diagnosis were selected based on their relevance to the investigation. Six studies focused on two classes of patients such as Cognitively Normal (CN) and AD. They reported a pooled prevalence of 49.28% (95% CI: 46.12-52.45%, p=0.32). The prevalence estimate for the three stages of cognitive impairment (CN, (Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and AD) was 29.75% (95% CI: 25.11-34.84%, p<0.01). Among five studies with 14,839 subjects, the analysis of four stages [i.e., Non demented (ND), Moderatly demented (MoD), Mild demented (MD), and AD] found an overall prevalence of 13.13% (95% CI: 3.75-36.66%, p<0.01). Four studies involving 3,819 subjects estimated the prevalence of six stages [CN, Significant Memory Concern (SMC), Early Mild Cognitive Impairment (EMCI), MCI, Late Mild Cognitive Impairment (LMCI), and AD], yielding a prevalence of 23.75% (95% CI: 12.22-41.12%, p<0.01). AD prevalence estimates are influenced by demographic and setting characteristics, as evidenced by the substantial heterogeneity observed across studies. The above findings suggest the usefulness of ML approaches in describing AD prevalence across various stages, providing valuable insights for future research.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Battineni G, Chintalapudi N, Amenta F

Machine Learning Driven by Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Classification of Alzheimer Disease Progression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Aging 2024;7:e59370

DOI: 10.2196/59370

PMID: 39714089

PMCID: 11704653

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.