Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
Date Submitted: Apr 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 12, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Perceived acceptability of technology modalities for the provision of universal Child and Family Health Nursing support in the first 6-8 months after birth: a cross sectional study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Future health outcomes for children are influenced by their early life experiences. Child and Family Health Nursing (CFHN) services provide universal care to families during the First 2000 days (conception-5 years) to support optimal health and developmental outcomes of children in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Use of technology represents a promising means to encourage family engagement with CFHN services and enable universal access to evidenced-based age and stage information. Currently there is little evidence exploring the acceptability of various models of technology-based support provided during the first 2000 days, as well as the maternal characteristics that may influence this.
Objective:
To describe; 1) the acceptability of technology-based modes of CFHN support to families in the first 6 months, and 2) the association between the acceptability of technology-based support and maternal characteristics.
Methods:
A cross sectional survey was undertaken between September to November 2021 with women who were 6-8 months post-partum within the Hunter New England (HNE) Local Health District of NSW, Australia. Survey questions collected information on maternal demographics and pregnancy characteristics, perceived stress, access to CFHN services, as well as preferences and acceptability of technology-based support. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the sample, the proportion of women accessing CFHN services, maternal acceptability of technology-based support from CFHN services, and appropriateness of timing of support. Multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to assess the association between maternal characteristics and the acceptability of technology based CFHN support.
Results:
365 women participated in the study, most were 25 to 34 years old (68%), had completed tertiary level education or higher (71%), and were employed or on maternity leave (78%). Almost all (98%) women reported accessing CFHN services in the first 6 months following their child's birth. The majority of women 'strongly agreed/agreed' that receiving information from CFHN via technology would be acceptable (82-92%), and most (≥90%) ‘strongly agreed/agreed’ with being provided information on a variety of relevant health topics. Acceptability of receiving information via websites was significantly associated with maternal employment status (P=.01). The acceptability of receiving support via telephone and email was significantly associated with maternal education level (P=.03, P=.02 respectively). Maternal age was also associated with the acceptability of email support (P=.04).
Conclusions:
Technology based CFHN support is generally acceptable to mothers. Maternal characteristics including employment status, education level and age were found to modify the acceptability of specific technology modalities. The findings of this research should be considered when designing technology-based solutions to providing universal age and stage child health and developmental support for families during the first 2000 days.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.