Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 29, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 5, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Considering Comorbidities and Individual Differences in Testing a Gaming Behavioral Activation App for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: Open Trial Pilot Intervention Study

Hamlett GE, Schrader C, Ferguson C, Kobylski LA, Picard R, Locascio JJ, McNally RJ, Cohen LS, Vanderkruik R

Considering Comorbidities and Individual Differences in Testing a Gaming Behavioral Activation App for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: Open Trial Pilot Intervention Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59154

DOI: 10.2196/59154

PMID: 39810410

PMCID: 11750158

Considering comorbidities and individual differences in testing a gaming Behavioral Activation app for perinatal depression and anxiety: A pilot intervention study

  • Gabriella E. Hamlett; 
  • Chloe Schrader; 
  • Craig Ferguson; 
  • Lauren A Kobylski; 
  • Rosalind Picard; 
  • Joseph J Locascio; 
  • Richard J McNally; 
  • Lee S Cohen; 
  • Rachel Vanderkruik

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mobile Behavioral Activation (BA) is efficacious for the treatment of perinatal depression, however, the effect of comorbidity on symptom trajectories remains underexplored which is important given that at least 10% of women in the perinatal period experience comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD).

Objective:

Our objective was to assess whether there are differences in symptom trajectories in pregnant participants with Comorbid Anxiety and Depression (CAD) as compared to those same with depression only (i.e., Major Depressive Disorder; MDD) during intervention with a Behavioral Activation (BA) mobile gaming app.

Methods:

Pregnant adults with either CAD (n = 10) or MDD (n = 7) used a BA app for 10 weeks and completed biweekly symptom severity questionnaires for depression and anxiety. We assessed whether baseline diagnoses were associated with differential symptom trajectories across the study with mixed effects longitudinal models.

Results:

When controlling for baseline symptoms, results revealed a significant interaction between baseline diagnosis and the quadratic component of study week on anxiety (β = 0.06, SE = 0.02, t(63) = 2.94, p = .005), revealing a tendency for anxiety in CAD group to increase initially and then decrease at an accelerated rate, whereas MDD symptoms were relatively stable across time. There was a significant effect of linear time on PHQ-9 (β = -0.39, SE = 0.11, t(68) = -3.51, p = .001), showing that PHQ-9 declined steadily across time for both groups. There was a significant effect of baseline diagnosis on PHQ-9 (β = -8.53, SE = 3.93, t(13) = -2.17, p = .05), suggesting that those with MDD had higher PHQ-9 scores post- treatment compared to those with CAD when holding other predictors constant.

Conclusions:

Findings underscore the need to consider comorbidities and individual variations in participants when developing scalable mobile interventions for perinatal populations. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hamlett GE, Schrader C, Ferguson C, Kobylski LA, Picard R, Locascio JJ, McNally RJ, Cohen LS, Vanderkruik R

Considering Comorbidities and Individual Differences in Testing a Gaming Behavioral Activation App for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: Open Trial Pilot Intervention Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59154

DOI: 10.2196/59154

PMID: 39810410

PMCID: 11750158

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.