Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 1, 2024
Date Accepted: May 25, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating Fitbits for Assessment of Physical Activity and Sleep in Pediatric Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study

Nestor BA, Baumer AM, Chimoff J, Delecourt B, Koike C, Tacugue N, Brusseau R, Roy N, Gaytan-Fuentes IA, Sethna N, Wallace D, Kossowsky J

Evaluating Fitbits for Assessment of Physical Activity and Sleep in Pediatric Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59074

DOI: 10.2196/59074

PMID: 40737606

PMCID: 12310148

Evaluating Fitbits for Assessment of Physical Activity and Sleep in Pediatric Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study

  • Bridget A Nestor; 
  • Andreas M Baumer; 
  • Justin Chimoff; 
  • Benoit Delecourt; 
  • Camila Koike; 
  • Nicole Tacugue; 
  • Roland Brusseau; 
  • Nathalie Roy; 
  • Israel A Gaytan-Fuentes; 
  • Navil Sethna; 
  • Danielle Wallace; 
  • Joe Kossowsky

ABSTRACT

Background:

Consumer-grade wearables, such as Fitbits, are a promising, cost-effective methodology for objectively assessing sleep and physical activity in youth with pain.

Objective:

The current study investigated the acceptability and feasibility of implementing Fitbits for youth with acute and chronic pain in and out of hospital settings while maintaining data security and patient confidentiality.

Methods:

We investigated participant experience of Fitbit usage over three to four weeks for a sample of youth with acute pain undergoing surgical procedures (N=34, mean age=14.46, SD=3.70, 47.06% female) and a sample of youth with chronic pain enrolled in an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment program (N=28, mean age=15.00, SD=2.33, 17.86% female). We assessed the acceptability of Fitbit usage through survey items probing comfortability (0=extremely uncomfortable to 10=extremely comfortable), perceived burdensomeness (0=not burdensome at all to 10=extremely burdensome), and open-ended issues or concerns. Feasibility was assessed by tracking the daily compliant wear of the Fitbit device, which was operationalized as more than 600 minutes of daily wear time. We created an automated data pipeline to ensure data security, patient confidentiality, and quality.

Results:

Acceptability findings revealed high levels of reported comfort (acute pain: M=8.56, SD=1.43; chronic pain: M=8.27, SD=1.69) and low levels of perceived burdensomeness (acute: M=0.68, SD=1.17; chronic: M=1.15, SD=1.38) related to Fitbit wearing in both samples. Transient concerns of mild wrist irritation and sleep discomfort were occasionally reported across both samples (15.79% of participants). Feasibility findings indicated high feasibility (acute: median compliance rate of 86.67%; chronic: median compliance rate of 96.65%) for the study duration in both samples.

Conclusions:

These findings support using Fitbits as an acceptable and feasible method of objective data collection regarding sleep and physical activity for youth with pain. Findings also highlight the logistics of implementing consumer-grade wearable devices throughout all stages of the clinical research process.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nestor BA, Baumer AM, Chimoff J, Delecourt B, Koike C, Tacugue N, Brusseau R, Roy N, Gaytan-Fuentes IA, Sethna N, Wallace D, Kossowsky J

Evaluating Fitbits for Assessment of Physical Activity and Sleep in Pediatric Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59074

DOI: 10.2196/59074

PMID: 40737606

PMCID: 12310148

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.