Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 1, 2024
Date Accepted: Oct 8, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

AI-Based Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring: Scoping Review

Chan PZ, Jin EY, Jansson M, Chew HSJ

AI-Based Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58892

DOI: 10.2196/58892

PMID: 39561353

PMCID: 11615544

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The use of artificial intelligence for non-invasive blood glucose monitoring: A scoping review

  • Pin Zhong Chan; 
  • Eric Yihao Jin; 
  • Miia Jansson; 
  • Han Shi Jocelyn Chew

ABSTRACT

Background:

Current blood glucose monitoring (BGM) methods are often invasive and require repetitive pricking of a finger to obtain blood samples, predisposing individuals to pain, discomfort and infection. Non-invasive blood glucose monitoring (NIBGMS) is ideal in minimising discomfort, reducing the risk of infection, and increasing convenience.

Objective:

Our main objective was to map the use cases of artificial intelligence (AI) in non-invasive continuous blood glucose monitoring.

Methods:

A systematic scoping review was conducted according to the Arksey O’Malley five-step framework. Seven electronic databases (EMBASE, Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, The Cochrane-Central Library, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore) were searched from inception until 08 February 2023. Study selection was conducted by two independent reviewers, descriptive analysis was conducted, and findings were presented narratively.

Results:

33 articles were included, representing studies from Asia, US, Europe, Middle East and Africa published between 2005 and 2023. Most studies used optical techniques (n=19, 57.6%) to estimate blood glucose levels (n=27, 81.8%). Others used electrochemical sensors (n=4), imaging (n=2), mixed techniques (n=2) and tissue impedance (n=1). Accuracy ranged from 35.56% to 94.23% and Clarke Error Grid (A+B) ranged from 86.91% to 100%. The most popular machine learning algorithm used was random forest (n=10) and the most popular deep learning model was artificial neural network (n=6). The studies reviewed demonstrate that some AI techniques can accurately predict glucose levels from non-invasive sources while enhancing comfort and ease of use for patients. However, the overall range of accuracy was wide due to the heterogeneity of models and input data.

Conclusions:

Efforts are needed to standardize and regulate the use of AI technologies in blood glucose monitoring, as well as develop consensus guidelines and protocols to ensure the quality and safety of AI-assisted monitoring systems. The use of AI for NIBGM is a promising area of research that has the potential to revolutionize diabetes management.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chan PZ, Jin EY, Jansson M, Chew HSJ

AI-Based Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58892

DOI: 10.2196/58892

PMID: 39561353

PMCID: 11615544

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.