Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Mar 21, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 5, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring the Feasibility and Acceptability of Technological Interventions to Prevent Adolescents’ Exposure to Online Pornography: Qualitative Research

Turvey J, McKay D, Kaur ST, Castree N, Chang S, Lim MSC

Exploring the Feasibility and Acceptability of Technological Interventions to Prevent Adolescents’ Exposure to Online Pornography: Qualitative Research

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024;7:e58684

DOI: 10.2196/58684

PMID: 39499925

PMCID: 11576612

Exploring the feasibility and acceptability of technological interventions to prevent adolescents’ exposure to online pornography: qualitative research

  • Jake Turvey; 
  • Dana McKay; 
  • Sarah T Kaur; 
  • Natasha Castree; 
  • Shanton Chang; 
  • Megan Su Cheng Lim

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

Amidst growing concern over the potential negative impact of pornography on young people's health and wellbeing, policymakers are looking towards new and emerging technological concepts for unexplored solutions, including AI and facial recognition.

Objective:

Objective:

This study sought to explore and ideate emerging technological interventions that are feasible, acceptable, and effective in preventing and controlling the exposure of young people to online pornographic material.

Methods:

Methods:

We conducted a series of qualitative co-design workshops with both adult (n=8, 32-53 years) and adolescent participants (n=4, 15-17 years) to ideate potential technological interventions that are feasible, acceptable, and effective at preventing and controlling the exposure of young people to online pornographic material. A story stem methodology was used to explore participants’ attitudes towards two unique technological prototypes.

Results:

Results:

Participants expressed a generally favourable view of the proposed technological concepts but remained unconvinced of their overall utility and effectiveness at preventing the intentional viewing of pornography by young people. Age-appropriate parent-child conversations remained participants’ preferred approach to mitigating potential harms from pornographic material, with parents also expressing a desire for more educational resources to help them better navigate these discussions. User privacy and data security was a primary concern for participants, particularly surrounding the use and collection of biometric data.

Conclusions:

Conclusions:

This study highlights the potential for new and emerging technologies to be useful tools in preventing the accidental exposure of young people to online pornographic material. However, participants remained less convinced of their ability to avert intentional viewing, with substantial concerns regarding technological efficacy, adaptability, and user privacy. Further co-design and prototype refinement is needed to better understand user acceptability and comfortability of these new technological interventions, alongside additional research exploring socio-cultural differences in information needs and user experiences.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Turvey J, McKay D, Kaur ST, Castree N, Chang S, Lim MSC

Exploring the Feasibility and Acceptability of Technological Interventions to Prevent Adolescents’ Exposure to Online Pornography: Qualitative Research

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024;7:e58684

DOI: 10.2196/58684

PMID: 39499925

PMCID: 11576612

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.