Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Telehealth Serious Illness Care Program for Older Adults with Myeloid Malignancies: A Single Arm Pilot Study
Marissa LoCastro;
Ying Wang;
Tristan Yu;
Soroush Mortaz-Hedjri;
Jason Mendler;
Sally Norton;
Rachelle Bernacki;
Thomas Carroll;
Heidi Klepin;
Lucy Wedow;
Sean Goonan;
Hannah Erdos;
Brenda Bagnato;
Jane Liesveld;
Eric Huselton;
Benzi Kluger;
Kah Poh Loh
ABSTRACT
Background:
Serious illness conversations (SICs) may help patients avoid unwanted treatments. We previously piloted the telehealth Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
Objective:
In this study, we aimed to understand the experience of the telehealth SICP from the clinician perspective.
Methods:
We studied 10 clinicians who delivered the telehealth SICP to 20 older adults with AML or MDS. Quantitative outcomes included confidence and acceptability. Confidence was measured using a 22-item survey (range 1-7, higher score better). Acceptability was measured using a 11-item survey (5-point Likert scale). Hypothesis testing was performed at α=0.10 (2-tailed) due to the pilot nature and small sample size. Clinicians participated in audio-recorded qualitative interviews at the end of the study to discuss their experience.
Results:
Eight clinicians completed the confidence measure and seven clinicians completed the acceptability measure. We found a statistically significant increase in overall confidence [mean increase of +0.5; Standard Deviation (SD) 0.6, P=.03]. The largest increase in confidence was in helping families with reconciliation and good-bye [+1.4 (SD 1.5, P=.04)]. The majority of clinicians agreed that the format was simple (6/7, 85.7%) and easy to use (6/7, 85.7%). Clinicians felt that the telehealth SICP was effective in understanding their patients' values about end-of-life care (7/7, 100.0%). Three qualitative themes emerged: 1) The telehealth SICP deepened relationships and renewed trust; 2) Each telehealth SICP visit felt unique and personal in a positive way; and 3) Uninterrupted, unrushed time optimized the visit experience.
Conclusions:
The telehealth SICP increased confidence in having SICs while deepening patient-clinician relationships. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04745676
Citation
Please cite as:
LoCastro M, Wang Y, Yu T, Mortaz-Hedjri S, Mendler J, Norton S, Bernacki R, Carroll T, Klepin H, Wedow L, Goonan S, Erdos H, Bagnato B, Liesveld J, Huselton E, Kluger B, Loh KP
Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Telehealth Serious Illness Care Program for Older Adults With Myeloid Malignancies: Single-Arm Pilot Study