Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Mar 17, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 20, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Implementation of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Model in Electronic Medical Record Systems: Evaluation Study Using Factor Analysis and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-Best-Worst Methods

Luo M Sr, Gu Y, Zhou F, Chen S

Implementation of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Model in Electronic Medical Record Systems: Evaluation Study Using Factor Analysis and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-Best-Worst Methods

JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e58498

DOI: 10.2196/58498

PMID: 39331952

PMCID: 11470222

Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Model Implementation evaluation in Electronic Medical Record Systems using FA and DEMATEL-BWM methods

  • Ming Luo Sr; 
  • Yu Gu; 
  • Feilong Zhou; 
  • Shaohong Chen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic medical record (EMR) systems are very important as one of the key points in healthcare. These systems help collect and store medical data related to patients and provide information to doctors and caregivers for better decision-making. Despite the importance of EMR, it is necessary to optimize these systems and improve the quality of healthcare. One way that can help improve EMR performance and healthcare quality is to implement the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) shared data model.

Objective:

This research aims to examine the effects of implementing the OMOP shared data model in EMR systems and improving the quality of healthcare.

Methods:

In this research study, three distinct methodologies are employed to explore various aspects of healthcare information systems. Firstly, the correlation between (EMR) systems and attitudes towards the OMOP is investigated using Factor Analysis (FA). Secondly, the weight of criteria and sub-criteria is determined through the Best Worst Method (BWM). Lastly, Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) Technique is applied to illustrate the interactions and interdependencies among the identified criteria.

Results:

Among all components, "EMR resolution" has the highest importance with a weight of 0.31007783, indicating its significance in the evaluation, while "EMR ease of use" has the lowest weight of 0.1860467.

Conclusions:

This show that, in the assessment of EMR, stakeholders attribute the greatest importance to the resolution aspect.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Luo M Sr, Gu Y, Zhou F, Chen S

Implementation of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Model in Electronic Medical Record Systems: Evaluation Study Using Factor Analysis and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-Best-Worst Methods

JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e58498

DOI: 10.2196/58498

PMID: 39331952

PMCID: 11470222

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.